Huawei P40 vs Oppo A92

Huawei P40 on Amazon USA
Oppo A92 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Huawei P40 on one side and the Oppo A92 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.9GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneHuawei P40 Oppo A92
Model version(s)

ANA-AN00, ANA-TN00

CPH2059
Release dateQ1 2020 Q2 2020
Network5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions5,86 x 2,80 x 0,33 in 6,38 x 2,97 x 0,35 in
Weight6.17 oz 6.77 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
plastic body
Screen size, colours6.1 inches, 16M colours 6.5 inches, 480 nits, 16M colours
Screen typeOLED IPS LCD
Resolution1080 x 2340 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Screen ratio19.5:9 20:9
Density422 ppi 405 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 10; EMUI 10.1 Android 10; ColorOS 7.1
ProcessorHiSilicon Kirin 990 5G Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665
Lithography7 nm FinFET 11 nm LPP
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.95 GHz

4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Silver @ 1.8 GHz
High performance cores

2x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.86 GHz
2x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.36 GHz

4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Gold @ 2.0 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsARM Mali-G76 MP16 Qualcomm Adreno 610
GPU execution units16 2
GPU shading units256 96
GPU base clock600 MHz -
GPU boost clock600 MHz 600 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point737.28 GFLOPS 115.2 GFLOPS
Memory8 GB RAM 8 GB RAM
Storage128 GB 128 GB
Memory cardUp to 256 GB Up to 256 GB
Photo

50 MP, f/1,9,
8 MP, f/2,4, 80mm,
16 MP, f/2,2, 17mm

48 MP, f/1,7,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP B/W, f/2,4
Video

4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/60fps

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/120fps
Front photo

32 MP, f/2,0

16 MP, f/2,0
Front video

1080p@30fps

1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 3.1 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity3,800 mAh 5,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 17 hours and 30 minutes ~ 9 hours and 10 minutes
TDP7 W -
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu449,714 180,893
Android PassMark Rating4,634 5,122
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
3,856 1,499
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
12,164 5,493
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
763 305
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
3,023 1,274
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Huawei P40 is greater. They were produced the same year.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Huawei P40 449,714
Oppo A92 180,893


The difference is 149%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Oppo A92 5,122
Huawei P40 4,634


The difference in performance is 11%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Huawei P40 3,856
12,164
Oppo A92 1,499
5,493


In single core, the difference is 157%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 121%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Huawei P40 763
3,023
Oppo A92 305
1,274


In single core, the difference is 150%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 137%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.



See also:

Huawei P40 LiteHuawei P40 Lite 5GHuawei P40 Lite EHuawei P40 ProHuawei P40 Pro+

Oppo A9Oppo A9 (2020)Oppo A91Oppo A92sOppo A93Oppo A93 5GOppo A94Oppo A94 5GOppo A95Oppo A95 5GOppo A96Oppo A96 5GOppo A97 5GOppo A98 5G




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.