FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Huawei Nova 3 vs Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Huawei Nova 3 on one side and the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.4GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.8GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Smartphone | Huawei Nova 3 | Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro | ||||||
| Model version(s) | PAR-AL00, PAR-LX1, PAR-LX1M, PAR-LX9, PAR-TL00, PAR-TL20 |
M2004J11G | ||||||
| Release date | Q3 2018 | Q2 2020 | ||||||
| Network | CDMA, GSM, HSPA, LTE | 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,18 x 2,90 x 0,29 in | 6,43 x 2,97 x 0,35 in | ||||||
| Weight | 5.86 oz | 7.72 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front and back glass, aluminum frame |
Front and back glass, aluminum frame |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.3 inches, 16M colours | 6.7 inches, 500 nits, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels | 1080 x 2400 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 | ||||||
| Density | 409 ppi | 395 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 8.1 | Android 10; MIUI 11 | ||||||
| Processor | HiSilicon Kirin 970 | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | ||||||
| Lithography | 10 nm FinFET+ | 7 nm N7P | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.84 GHz | 4x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Silver @ 1.8 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2.36 GHz | 1x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Prime @ 2.84 GHz 3x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Gold @ 2.42 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G72 MP12 | Qualcomm Adreno 650 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 12 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 192 | 512 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 746 MHz | 587 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 330 GFLOPS | 1,250 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 4 / 6 GB RAM | 6 / 8 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 / 256 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 256 GB | - | ||||||
| Photo | 16 MP, 27mm 24 MP B/W, 27mm |
64 MP, f/1,9, 26mm, 5 MP, f/2,2, 50mm, 13 MP, f/2,4, 2 MP, f/2,4 |
||||||
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 24 MP, f/2,0, 26mm 2 MP, capteur de profondeur |
20 MP, f/2,2 | ||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 3,750 mAh | 4,700 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 5 hours | ~ 12 hours and 20 minutes | ||||||
| TDP | 9 W | - | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 209,291 | 571,011 | ||||||
| Android PassMark Rating | 5,317 | 11,093 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 1,829 | 4,185 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 6,205 | 13,082 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is larger. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro was started more recently.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro |
571,011 |
| Huawei Nova 3 |
209,291 |
The difference is 173%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Android PassMark Rating | |
|---|---|
| Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro |
11,093 |
| Huawei Nova 3 |
5,317 |
The difference in performance is 109%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro |
4,185 13,082 |
| Huawei Nova 3 |
1,829 6,205 |
In single core, the difference is 129%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 111%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
See also:
Huawei Nova 2Huawei Nova 2iHuawei Nova 3iHuawei Nova 4Huawei Nova 4eHuawei Nova 5Huawei Nova 5 ProHuawei Nova 5iHuawei Nova 5THuawei Nova 6Huawei Nova 6 5GHuawei Nova 6 SEHuawei Nova 7 5GHuawei Nova 7 Pro 5GHuawei Nova 7 SEHuawei Nova 7iHuawei Nova 8 5GHuawei Nova 8 Pro 4GHuawei Nova 8 Pro 5GHuawei Nova 8 SEHuawei Nova 8iHuawei Nova 9Huawei Nova 9 ProHuawei Nova 9 SEHuawei Nova 9 SE 5GDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.