FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Honor X30 vs Google Pixel 3a
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Honor X30 on one side and the Google Pixel 3a on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.2GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Honor X30 | Google Pixel 3a | ||||||
| Model version(s) | ANY-AN00 |
G020A, G020E, G020B |
||||||
| Release date | Q4 2021 | Q3 2019 | ||||||
| Network | 5G, CDMA, CDMA2000, GSM, HSPA, LTE | CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,54 x 2,98 x 0,32 in | 5,96 x 2,76 x 0,32 in | ||||||
| Weight | 6.67 oz | 5.19 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front and back glass, aluminum frame |
Front glass, plastic body |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.8 inches, 16M colours | 5.6 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | OLED | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels | 1080 x 2220 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 18.5:9 | ||||||
| Density | 385 ppi | 441 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 11; Magic UI 4.2 | Android 9 | ||||||
| Processor | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Qualcomm SDM670 Snapdragon 670 | ||||||
| Lithography | 6 nm N6 | 10 nm LPP | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 6x Qualcomm Kryo 660 Silver @ 1.7 GHz |
6x Qualcomm Kryo 360 Silver @ 1.7 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | 2x Qualcomm Kryo 660 Gold @ 2.2 GHz |
2x Qualcomm Kryo 360 Gold @ 2.0 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 619 | Qualcomm Adreno 615 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 128 | 128 | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 825 MHz | 700 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | - | 358.4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 6 / 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 / 256 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 48 MP, f/1,8, 26mm, 2 MP, f/2,4, 2 MP, f/2,4 |
12,2 MP, f/1,8, 28mm |
||||||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 16 MP, f/2,5 |
8 MP, f/2,0, 24mm |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
1080p@30fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 3,000 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 14 hours | ~ 12 hours and 30 minutes | ||||||
| TDP | - | 5 W | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| DxOMark | - | 101 | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 396,902 | 157,937 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 3,034 | 1,610 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 7,269 | 5,079 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Honor X30 is greater. The Honor X30 has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Honor X30 |
396,902 |
| Google Pixel 3a |
157,937 |
The difference is 151%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Honor X30 |
3,034 7,269 |
| Google Pixel 3a |
1,610 5,079 |
In single core, the difference is 88%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 43%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
See also:
Honor X30 MaxHonor X30iGoogle Pixel 3Google Pixel 3 XLGoogle Pixel 3a XL
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.