FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Google Pixel 5a 5G vs Oukitel WP5
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Google Pixel 5a 5G on one side and the Oukitel WP5 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.4GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Google Pixel 5a 5G | Oukitel WP5 | ||||||
| Model version(s) | G1F8F, G4S1M | WP5 | ||||||
| Release date | Q3 2021 | Q4 2019 | ||||||
| Network | 5G, CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE | CDMA, GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,10 x 2,90 x 0,30 in | 6,15 x 3,02 x 0,71 in | ||||||
| Weight | 6.46 oz | 13.05 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, aluminum body |
Front glass, plastic body | ||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.3 inches, 16M colours | 5.5 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | OLED | IPS LCD | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 720 x 1440 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 18:9 | ||||||
| Density | 415 ppi | 293 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 11 | Android 9 | ||||||
| Processor | Qualcomm SM7250-AB Snapdragon 765G 5G | MediaTek MT6761 Helio A22 | ||||||
| Lithography | 7 nm LPP EUV | 12 nm FinFET | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.8 GHz |
- | ||||||
| High performance cores | 1x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.4 GHz 1x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.2 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 620 | Imagination PowerVR GE8320 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 3 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 192 | 64 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 750 MHz | 660 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | - | 41.6 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | - | Up to 128 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 12,2 MP, f/1,7, 27mm, 16 MP, f/2,2 |
13 MP, f/2,0, 2 MP, 2 MP |
||||||
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
1080p@30fps | ||||||
| Front photo | 8 MP, f/2,0, 24mm |
5 MP |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
720p@30fps | ||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 4,680 mAh | 8,000 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 12 hours and 10 minutes | ~ 12 hours | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 388,416 | 73,413 | ||||||
| Android PassMark Rating | 6,554 | 2,133 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 single core | 2,651 | 778 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 5,046 | 2,223 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 576 | 156 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 1,326 | 520 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Google Pixel 5a 5G has more cores, the maximum frequency of Google Pixel 5a 5G is greater. The Google Pixel 5a 5G has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total Score | |
|---|---|
Google Pixel 5a 5G | 388,416 |
| Oukitel WP5 | 73,413 |
The difference is 429%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Android PassMark Rating | |
|---|---|
| Google Pixel 5a 5G | 6,554 |
| Oukitel WP5 | 2,133 |
The difference in performance is 207%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
With Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Google Pixel 5a 5G |
2,651 5,046 |
| Oukitel WP5 |
778 2,223 |
In single core, the difference is 241%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 127%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
With Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Google Pixel 5a 5G |
576 1,326 |
| Oukitel WP5 |
156 520 |
In single core, the difference is 269%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 155%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Oukitel WP10Oukitel WP12Oukitel WP12 ProOukitel WP13Oukitel WP15Oukitel WP15SOukitel WP16Oukitel WP17Oukitel WP18Oukitel WP18 ProOukitel WP19Oukitel WP2Oukitel WP20Oukitel WP20 ProOukitel WP21Oukitel WP21 UltraOukitel WP22Oukitel WP23Oukitel WP23 ProOukitel WP26Oukitel WP27Oukitel WP28Oukitel WP30 ProOukitel WP32Oukitel WP5 ProOukitel WP6Oukitel WP7Oukitel WP8 ProOukitel WP9Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.