Google Pixel 3a XL vs Meizu MX6

Google Pixel 3a XL on Amazon USA
Meizu MX6 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Google Pixel 3a XL on one side and the Meizu MX6 on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 10 cores, 10 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.1GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.






Specification comparison:


Smartphone Google Pixel 3a XL Meizu MX6
Model version(s)

G020C, G020G, G020F

MX6, MZ-MX6
Release date Q3 2019 Q3 2016
Network CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions 6,30 x 3,00 x 0,32 in 6,05 x 2,96 x 0,29 in
Weight 5.89 oz 5.47 oz
Body Front glass,
plastic body
Front glass,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours 6.0 inches, 16M colours 5.5 inches, 16M colours
Screen type OLED TDDI
Resolution 1080 x 2160 pixels 1080 x 1920 pixels
Screen ratio 18:9 16:9
Density 402 ppi 403 ppi
Operating system Android 9.0 Android 6.0
Processor Qualcomm SDM670 Snapdragon 670 MediaTek MT6797 Helio X20
Lithography 10 nm LPP 20 nm HPM
Cores 8 10
Threads 8 10
Energy cores

6x Qualcomm Kryo 360 Silver @ 1.7 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.4 GHz
High performance cores

2x Qualcomm Kryo 360 Gold @ 2.0 GHz

2x ARM Cortex-A72 @ 2.1 GHz
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.85 GHz
GPU integrated graphics Qualcomm Adreno 615 ARM Mali-T880 MP4
GPU execution units 2 4
GPU shading units 128 64
GPU base clock - 780 MHz
GPU boost clock 700 MHz 780 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 358.4 GFLOPS 136 GFLOPS
Memory 4 GB RAM 3 / 4 GB RAM
Storage 64 GB 32 GB
Photo

12,2 MP, f/1,8, 28mm

12 MP, f/2,0
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps

4K@30fps,
1080p@30fps
Front photo

8 MP, f/2,0, 24mm

5 MP, f/2,0
Front video

1080p@30fps

1080p@30fps
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth 5.0, A2DP, LE 4.1, A2DP
USB USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C
Battery capacity 3,700 mAh 3,060 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 14 hours and 40 minutes ~ 8 hours
TDP 5 W -
Head SAR - -
Body SAR - -
DxOMark 101 -
AnTuTu 158,044 77,311
Android PassMark Rating 5,198 3,328
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
1,629 1,587
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
5,181 4,728
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Meizu MX6 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Meizu MX6 is larger. The Google Pixel 3a XL has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.


AnTuTu - Total score
Google Pixel 3a XL 158,044
Meizu MX6 77,311


The difference is 104%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Google Pixel 3a XL 5,198
Meizu MX6 3,328


The difference in performance is 56%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Google Pixel 3a XL 1,629
5,181
Meizu MX6 1,587
4,728


In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 10%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

See also:

Meizu MX4




GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland