Google Pixel 3 vs Tecno Pop 6 Go

Google Pixel 3 on Amazon USA
Tecno Pop 6 Go on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Google Pixel 3 on one side and the Tecno Pop 6 Go on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.8GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.5GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneGoogle Pixel 3 Tecno Pop 6 Go
Model version(s)

G013A

BE6j
Release dateQ4 2018 Q2 2022
NetworkCDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSP GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions5,73 x 2,69 x 0,31 in 6,31 x 3,10 x 0,43 in
Weight5.22 oz 6.67 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
plastic body
Screen size, colours5.5 inches, 16M colours 6.0 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeP-OLED IPS LCD
Resolution1080 x 2160 pixels 480 x 960 pixels
Screen ratio18:9 18:9
Density443 ppi 179 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 9 HiOS 7.6 (Android 11 Go)
ProcessorQualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 MediaTek MT6739WW
Lithography10 nm FinFET LPP 28 nm HPM
Cores8 4
Threads8 4
Energy cores

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.9 GHz

-
High performance cores

4x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2.8 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.495 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 630 Imagination PowerVR GE8100
GPU execution units2 1
GPU shading units256 16
GPU clock710 MHz 570 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point737 GFLOPS 20.8 GFLOPS
Memory4 GB RAM 1 / 2 GB RAM
Storage64 / 128 GB 16 / 32 GB
Memory card- Up to 128 GB
Photo

12,2 MP, f/1,8, 28mm

5 MP, f/2,2
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps,
720p@240fps

1080p@30fps
Front photo

8 MP, f/1,8, 28mm
8 MP, f/2,2, 19mm

5 MP
Front video

1080p@30fps

720p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE 4.2, A2DP
USBUSB Type-C 3.1 microUSB 2.0
Battery capacity2,915 mAh 4,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use)~ 10 hours ~ 12 hours
TDP9 W -
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
DxOMark101 -
AnTuTu237,332 43,704
Android PassMark Rating6,834 687
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,280 629
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
7,711 1,510
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
670 99
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
2,069 341
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Google Pixel 3 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Google Pixel 3 is greater. The Tecno Pop 6 Go was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Google Pixel 3 237,332
Tecno Pop 6 Go 43,704


The difference is 443%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Google Pixel 3 6,834
Tecno Pop 6 Go 687


The difference in performance is 895%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Google Pixel 3 2,280
7,711
Tecno Pop 6 Go 629
1,510


In single core, the difference is 262%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 411%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Google Pixel 3 670
2,069
Tecno Pop 6 Go 99
341


In single core, the difference is 577%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 507%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.



See also:

Google Pixel 2Google Pixel 2 XLGoogle Pixel 3 XLGoogle Pixel 3aGoogle Pixel 3a XLGoogle Pixel 4Google Pixel 4 XLGoogle Pixel 4aGoogle Pixel 4a 5GGoogle Pixel 5Google Pixel 5a 5GGoogle Pixel 6Google Pixel 6 ProGoogle Pixel 6aGoogle Pixel 7Google Pixel 7 ProGoogle Pixel 7aGoogle Pixel 8Google Pixel 8 ProGoogle Pixel 8aGoogle Pixel FoldGoogle Pixel XL




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.