FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Doogee X95 Pro vs Sony Ericsson Xperia Play
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Doogee X95 Pro on one side and the Sony Ericsson Xperia Play on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximale frequency of 1.8GHz. The second chips has a total of 1 cores, 1 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Doogee X95 Pro | Sony Ericsson Xperia Play | ||||||
| Model version(s) | X95Pro | R88i, R800a, R800at, R800i | ||||||
| Release date | Q1 2021 | Q1 2011 | ||||||
| Network | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,57 x 3,05 x 0,35 in | 4,69 x 2,44 x 0,63 in | ||||||
| Weight | 6.25 oz | 6.17 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, plastic body |
Front and back glass, aluminum frame | ||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.5 inches, 16M colours | 4.0 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | IPS LCD, 600Hz | LED-Backlit LCD | ||||||
| Resolution | 540 x 1200 pixels | 480 x 854 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 16:9 | ||||||
| Density | 202 ppi | 245 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 10 | Android 2.3.4 (Gingerbread) | ||||||
| Processor | MediaTek MT6761V/WE Helio A20 | Qualcomm MSM8255 Snapdragon S2 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm FFC | 45 nm | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 1 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 1 | ||||||
| High performance cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.8 GHz |
1x Qualcomm Scorpion @ 1.0 MHz | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 | Qualcomm Adreno 205 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 4 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 128 | 4 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 550 MHz | 245 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 550 MHz | 266 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 20.8 GFLOPS | 8.51 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 4 GB RAM | 400 MB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 32 GB | 512 MB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 128 GB | Up to 32 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 13 MP, 2 MP, 2 MP |
5 MP |
||||||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
720p | ||||||
| Front photo | 5 MP, f/2,2 |
VGA |
||||||
| Front video | 720p@30fps |
- | ||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 2.1, A2DP | ||||||
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 4,350 mAh | 1,500 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Ion | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 13 hours | ~ 5 hours and 30 minutes | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 76,608 | 4,812 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 single core | 768 | 345 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 2,207 | 324 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Doogee X95 Pro has more cores, the maximum frequency of Doogee X95 Pro is greater. The Doogee X95 Pro has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total Score | |
|---|---|
Doogee X95 Pro | 76,608 |
| Sony Ericsson Xperia Play | 4,812 |
The difference is 1492%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
With Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Doogee X95 Pro |
768 2,207 |
| Sony Ericsson Xperia Play |
345 324 |
In single core, the difference is 123%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 581%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
See also:
Sony Ericsson Xperia Play CDMADisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.