Doogee S68 Pro vs Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro

Doogee S68 Pro on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Doogee S68 Pro on one side and the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.1GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.

Specification comparison:

SmartphoneDoogee S68 Pro Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro
Model version(s)


Release dateQ4 2019 Q3 2019
Dimensions6,44 x 3,15 x 0,65 in 6,44 x 2,95 x 0,35 in
Weight8.65 oz 7.23 oz
BodyFront glass,
plastic body
Front glass,
aluminum body
Screen size, colours5.9 inches, 16M colours 6.4 inches, 16M colours
Resolution1080 x 2280 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Screen ratio2.1:1 19.5:9
Density428 ppi 403 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 9 Android 9
ProcessorMediaTek MT6771T Helio P70 Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+
Lithography12 nm HPM 7 nm N7
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2 GHz

4x Qualcomm Kryo 485 Silver @ 1.78 GHz
High performance cores

4x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2.1 GHz

1x Qualcomm Kryo 485 Gold Prime @ 2.96 GHz
3x Qualcomm Kryo 485 Gold @ 2.42 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsARM Mali-G72 MP3 Qualcomm Adreno 640
GPU execution units3 2
GPU shading units48 384
GPU clock900 MHz 675 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point86.4 GFLOPS 1,037 GFLOPS
Memory6 GB RAM 8 / 12 GB RAM
Storage128 GB 128 / 256 GB
Memory cardUp to 256 GB -

21,6 MP, f/2,0

48 MP, f/1,8,
12 MP, f/2,2


Front photo

16 MP, f/2,2

20 MP, f/2,0
Front video


WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP 5.0, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity6,300 mAh 4,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use)~ 12 hours ~ 14 hours and 20 minutes
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
DxOMark- 84
AnTuTu177,353 459,132
Android PassMark Rating4,665 8,120
Geekbench 4 single core
1,168 3,617
Geekbench 4 multi-core
5,055 10,838

We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is larger. They were produced the same year.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.

AnTuTu - Total Score
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 459,132
Doogee S68 Pro 177,353

The difference is 159%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

Android PassMark Rating
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 8,120
Doogee S68 Pro 4,665

The difference in performance is 74%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 3,617
Doogee S68 Pro 1,168

In single core, the difference is 210%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 114%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software. © 2023 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland