FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Doogee S68 Pro vs Google Pixel
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Doogee S68 Pro on one side and the Google Pixel on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.1GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.3GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Doogee S68 Pro | Google Pixel | ||||||
| Model version(s) | S68Pro | G-2PW4100, G-2PW4200 | ||||||
| Release date | Q4 2019 | Q4 2016 | ||||||
| Network | CDMA, GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,44 x 3,15 x 0,65 in | 5,66 x 2,74 x 0,33 in | ||||||
| Weight | 8.65 oz | 5.04 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, plastic body |
Front and back glass, aluminum body | ||||||
| Screen size, colours | 5.9 inches, 16M colours | 5.0 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | IPS LCD | AMOLED | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 2280 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 2.1:1 | 16:9 | ||||||
| Density | 428 ppi | 441 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 9 | Android 7.1 | ||||||
| Processor | MediaTek MT6771T Helio P70 | Qualcomm MSM8996 Pro-AB Snapdragon 821 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm HPM | 14 nm FinFET LPP | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2 GHz |
2x Qualcomm Kryo @ 2.18 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2.1 GHz |
2x Qualcomm Kryo @ 2.34 GHz | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G72 MP3 | Qualcomm Adreno 530 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 3 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 48 | 256 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 900 MHz | 624 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 86.4 GFLOPS | 498.5 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 GB | 32 / 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 256 GB | - | ||||||
| Photo | 21,6 MP, f/2,0 |
12,3 MP, f/2,0 |
||||||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@240fps | ||||||
| Front photo | 16 MP, f/2,2 |
8 MP, f/2,4 |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
1080p@30fps | ||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 4.2, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 6,300 mAh | 2,770 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Ion | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 12 hours | ~ 7 hours and 40 minutes | ||||||
| TDP | - | 6 W | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| DxOMark | - | 90 | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 177,353 | 204,405 | ||||||
| Android PassMark Rating | 4,665 | 2,029 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 single core | 1,168 | 1,581 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 5,055 | 3,863 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 284 | 318 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 1,253 | 906 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Doogee S68 Pro has more cores, the maximum frequency of Google Pixel is larger. The Doogee S68 Pro has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total Score | |
|---|---|
Google Pixel | 204,405 |
| Doogee S68 Pro | 177,353 |
The difference is 15%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Android PassMark Rating | |
|---|---|
| Doogee S68 Pro | 4,665 |
| Google Pixel | 2,029 |
The difference in performance is 130%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
With Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Doogee S68 Pro |
1,168 5,055 |
| Google Pixel |
1,581 3,863 |
In single core, the difference is -26%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 31%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
With Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Doogee S68 Pro |
284 1,253 |
| Google Pixel |
318 906 |
In single core, the difference is -11%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 38%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Google Pixel 2Google Pixel 2 XLGoogle Pixel 3Google Pixel 3 XLGoogle Pixel 3aGoogle Pixel 3a XLGoogle Pixel 4Google Pixel 4 XLGoogle Pixel 4aGoogle Pixel 4a 5GGoogle Pixel 5Google Pixel 5a 5GGoogle Pixel 6Google Pixel 6 ProGoogle Pixel 6aGoogle Pixel 7Google Pixel 7 ProGoogle Pixel 7aGoogle Pixel 8Google Pixel 8 ProGoogle Pixel FoldGoogle Pixel XLDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.