GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor Graphics card


Cubot X19 vs Motorola Moto E5 Plus

Cubot X19 on Amazon USA
Motorola Moto E5 Plus on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Cubot X19 on one side and the Motorola Moto E5 Plus on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.5GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.4GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.






Specifications:


Smartphone Cubot X19 Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Model version(s) X19 Motorola Moto E Plus (5)
Release date Q1 2019 Q2 2018
Network CDMA, GSM, HSPA, LTE CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions 6,10 x 2,93 x 0,37 in 6,33 x 2,96 x 0,37 in
Weight 6.13 oz 6.95 oz
Body Front glass,
plastic body
Plastic front,
aluminum body
Screen size, colours 5.9 inches, 16M colours 6.0 inches, 16M colours
Screen type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Resolution 1080 x 2160 pixels 720 x 1440 pixels
Screen ratio 18:9 18:9
Density 407 ppi 268 ppi
Operating system Android 9.0 Android 8.0
Processor MediaTek MT6763T Helio P23 Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425
Lithography 16 nm FFC 28 nm LP
Cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Energy cores 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.65 GHz -
High performance cores 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.5 GHz 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.4 GHz
GPU integrated graphics ARM Mali-G71 MP2 Qualcomm Adreno 308
GPU execution units 2 1
GPU shading units 32 24
GPU clock rate 770 MHz 500 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 49.3 GFLOPS 24 GFLOPS
Memory 4 GB RAM 2 / 3 GB RAM
Storage 64 GB 16 / 32 GB
Memory card Up to 128 GB Up to 256 GB
Photo 16 MP, f/2,0 12 MP, f/2,0
Video 1080p30 1080p30
Front photo 16 MP, f/2,2 5 MP, f/2,0
Front video 1080p30 1080p30
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Bluetooth 4.2, A2DP 4.2, A2DP, LE
USB USB Type-C 2.0 microUSB 2.0
Battery capacity 4,000 mAh 5,000 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 10 hours and 30 minutes ~ 18 hours
TDP - 5 W
Head SAR - -
Body SAR - -
AnTuTu 92,783 44,814
Android PassMark Rating 3,292 984
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
948 546
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
3,823 1,900
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Cubot X19 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Cubot X19 is greater. The Cubot X19 has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performances :


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.


AnTuTu - Total score
Cubot X19#ad 92,783
Motorola Moto E5 Plus#ad 44,814


The difference is 107%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Cubot X19#ad 3,292
Motorola Moto E5 Plus#ad 984


The difference in performance is 235%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Cubot X19 948
3,823
Motorola Moto E5 Plus 546
1,900


In single core, the difference is 74%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 101%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.




GadgetVersus.com © 2021 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland