Blackview A53 vs Oppo A92

Blackview A53 on Amazon USA
Oppo A92 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Blackview A53 on one side and the Oppo A92 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneBlackview A53 Oppo A92
Model version(s)

A53

CPH2059
Release dateQ1 2023 Q2 2020
NetworkGSM, HSPA, LTE GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,48 x 3,03 x 0,37 in 6,38 x 2,97 x 0,35 in
Weight6.81 oz 6.77 oz
BodyFront glass,
plastic body
Front glass,
plastic body
Screen size, colours6.5 inches, 16M colours 6.5 inches, 480 nits, 16M colours
Screen typeIPS LCD IPS LCD
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 20:9
Density270 ppi 405 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 12, Doke OS G0 3.0 Android 10; ColorOS 7.1
ProcessorMediaTek MT6761 Helio A22 Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665
Lithography12 nm FinFET 11 nm LPP
Cores4 8
Threads4 8
Energy cores

-

4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Silver @ 1.8 GHz
High performance cores

4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz

4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Gold @ 2.0 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsImagination PowerVR GE8322 Qualcomm Adreno 610
GPU execution units4 2
GPU shading units128 96
GPU base clock660 MHz -
GPU boost clock660 MHz 600 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point128 GFLOPS 115.2 GFLOPS
Memory3 GB RAM 8 GB RAM
Storage16 GB 128 GB
Memory cardUp to 512 GB Up to 256 GB
Photo

13 MP

48 MP, f/1,7,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP B/W, f/2,4
Video

1080p@30fps

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/120fps
Front photo

5 MP

16 MP, f/2,0
Front video

1080p@30fps

1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity5,080 mAh 5,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 10 hours ~ 9 hours and 10 minutes
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu87,944 180,893
Android PassMark Rating1,146 5,122
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
759 1,499
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
2,048 5,493
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
164 305
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
492 1,274
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Oppo A92 has a larger number of cores, they have an identical turbo frequency. The Blackview A53 has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Oppo A92 180,893
Blackview A53 87,944


The difference is 106%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Oppo A92 5,122
Blackview A53 1,146


The difference in performance is 347%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo A92 1,499
5,493
Blackview A53 759
2,048


In single core, the difference is 97%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 168%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo A92 305
1,274
Blackview A53 164
492


In single core, the difference is 86%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 159%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.



See also:

Blackview A52Blackview A52 ProBlackview A53 ProBlackview A55Blackview A55 Pro

Oppo A9Oppo A9 (2020)Oppo A91Oppo A92sOppo A93Oppo A93 5GOppo A94Oppo A94 5GOppo A95Oppo A95 5GOppo A96Oppo A96 5GOppo A97 5GOppo A98 5G




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.