Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max on Amazon USA
Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max on one side and the Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 6 cores, 6 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.7GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.9GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.

Specification comparison:

SmartphoneApple iPhone 11 Pro Max Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos
Model version(s)

A2161, A2218, A2220

SM-N960F, SM-N960N, SM-N960X
Release dateQ3 2019 Q4 2018
Dimensions6,22 x 3,06 x 0,32 in 6,37 x 3,01 x 0,35 in
Weight7.97 oz 7.09 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
frame in stainless steel
Front and back glass,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours6.5 inches, 800 nits, 16M colours 6.4 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeXDR OLED Super AMOLED
Resolution1242 x 2688 pixels 1440 x 2960 pixels
Screen ratio19.5:9 18.5:9
Density458 ppi 516 ppi
Operating systemiOS 13 Android 8.1
ProcessorApple A13 Bionic Samsung Exynos 9 Series 9810
Lithography7 nm (N7 Pro) 10 nm LPE
Cores6 8
Threads6 8
Energy cores

4x Apple Thunder @ 1.8 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.9 GHz
High performance cores

2x Apple Lightning @ 2.65 GHz

4x Samsung Exynos M3 @ 2.9 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsApple A13 Bionic GPU ARM Mali-G72 MP18
GPU execution units32 18
GPU shading units256 288
GPU clock1,350 MHz 572 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point691.2 GFLOPS 370 GFLOPS
Memory4 GB RAM 6 / 8 GB RAM
Storage64 / 512 GB 128 / 512 GB
Memory card- Up to 512 GB

12 MP, f/1,8, 26mm,
12 MP, f/2,0, 52mm,
12 MP, f/2,4, 13mm

12 MP, f/1,5-2,4, 26mm


Front photo

12 MP, f/2,2

12 MP, f/2,4, 52mm
Front video


WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
USBmicroUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 3.1
Battery capacity3,969 mAh 4,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Ion Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use)~ 16 hours and 15 minutes ~ 12 hours and 10 minutes
TDP6 W 8 W
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
DxOMark- 103
AnTuTu487,832 320,567
(iOS | Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
5,432 3,430
(iOS | Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
13,554 8,657

We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos is larger. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.

AnTuTu - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 487,832
Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos 320,567

The difference is 52%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - iOS & Android
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 5,432
Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos 3,430

In single core, the difference is 58%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 57%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software. © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.