GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor

Unisoc Specs


Unisoc on Amazon USA


Processor specifications of the group of processors Unisoc. We also look at the respective performance in the benchmarks.

Specifications:


Unisoc SC9863A 2018 Q4 28 nm HPC+ 4 4 1.2 1.6 0.256 3 3 74470 8840 815 3338 90
Unisoc SC9863 2019 Q1 28 nm HPC+ 4 4 1.2 1.6 0.256 3 3 34000 818 3365 147 727 70
Unisoc SC9830 2016 Q1 28 nm HPm 4 4 1.3 1.3 1 2 3 3.9 72 22380 451 1177 130
Unisoc SC7715 2014 Q3 28 nm HPm 1 1 1.2 1.2 0.256 0.512 3 362 340 50


Price: prices can change over time. For technical reasons, they are not updated in real time. This is only an average of the results on the first page of each product, whether new or used. Shipping costs have not been integrated. To know the final price of the product, please go to the form of the shop. If no price is indicated, it means that we did not find any offers during the last update.

This comparative table allows us to better appreciate the differences between the various processors. The performance for Geekbench 4 single-core and multi-core are established by default on the Windows operating system, also on Linux if available.

For mobile and laptop processors, this is the overall price of the device, as you can not buy the processor alone, at least it is rare.

Ratios: the performance / price ratio takes into account the performance on Geekbench 4 multi-core, divided by the price of the new product recent, used otherwise. The performance / rdp ratio takes into account the performance on Geekbench 4 multi-core, divided by the TDP, ie its electricity consumption. The performance / global cost ratio is even more interesting because it takes into account the price and also a virtual electricity consumption of 13 hours per day, every day, for five years including the cost per kWh.

Performances:

Parallel display of the respective performance of the various processors for this group of chips. We evaluate the power with the help of several benchmark software if available, such as Cinebench, AnTuTu, PassMark, or Geekbench.


Performance comparison on the AnTuTu benchmark platform for mobile devices:


AnTuTu - Total score
Unisoc SC9863A 74,470
Unisoc SC9863 34,000
Unisoc SC9830 22,380


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Performance comparison on the Passmark benchmark platform for IT devices:


Android PassMark Rating
Unisoc SC9863A 8,840


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.


On Android: performance comparison in Geekbench 4 with Android operating system.


Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Unisoc SC9863 818
3,365
Unisoc SC9863A 815
3,338
Unisoc SC9830 451
1,177
Unisoc SC7715 362
340


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


On Android: performance comparison in Geekbench 5 with Android operating system.


Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android
Unisoc SC9863 147
727


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

List of comparisons:

AMDAMD A6AMD A8AMD AthlonAMD EPYCAMD JaguarAMD OpteronAMD RyzenAMD Ryzen 3AMD Ryzen 3 2AMD Ryzen 3 3AMD Ryzen 5AMD Ryzen 5 2AMD Ryzen 5 3AMD Ryzen 7AMD Ryzen 7 2AMD Ryzen 7 3AMD Ryzen 9AMD Ryzen 9 3AMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD Ryzen Threadripper 2AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3AMD ZenAMD Zen 2AMD Zen+AmlogicAppleBroadcomDual AMDDual AMD EPYCDual AMD OpteronDual Intel XeonDual Intel Xeon PlatinumHiSiliconHiSilicon KirinIntelIntel AtomIntel BroadwellIntel Cascade LakeIntel Cascade Lake-XIntel CeleronIntel Coffee LakeIntel Comet LakeIntel CoreIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 QuadIntel Core i3Intel Core i3-10Intel Core i3-9Intel Core i5Intel Core i5-10Intel Core i5-9Intel Core i7Intel Core i7-10Intel Core i7-9Intel Core i9Intel Core i9-10Intel Core i9-9Intel Core m3Intel HaswellIntel Ice LakeIntel Ivy BridgeIntel Kaby LakeIntel PentiumIntel Pentium 4Intel Sandy BridgeIntel SkylakeIntel Skylake-XIntel XeonIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Xeon WMediaTekMediaTek DimensityMicrosoftNvidiaNvidia TegraOcta Intel XeonQuad Intel XeonQualcommQualcomm SnapdragonRockchipSamsungSamsung ExynosSamsung Exynos 7Samsung Exynos 7 OctaSamsung Exynos 9Samsung Exynos 9 OctaUnisocProcessors groups

List of benchmarks:

AnTuTuGeekbench 4 on AndroidGeekbench 5 on AndroidPassMarkGFLOPS performance

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask EspaƱa W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland