GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor

Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 vs MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65

Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 on Amazon USA
MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 on one side and the MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.3GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first broadcast, the maximum number of PCIe lines, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15, as well as an average price.


Processor Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65
Market Smartphone Smartphone
Family Exynos Helio P
Part number(s), S-Spec Exynos 7 Octa 9611, s5E9611 P65, MT6768
Release date Q3 2019 Q3 2019
Lithography 10 nm LPE 12 nm HPM
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 8
Base frequency 1.7 GHz 1.7 GHz
Turbo frequency 2.3 GHz 2.0 GHz
Energy cores 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.7 GHz 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.7 GHz
High performance cores 4x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2.3 GHz 2x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2.0 GHz
Cache memory 2 MB 2 MB
Max memory capacity 6 GB 8 GB
Memory types LPDDR4X LPDDR3-1866
Max # of memory channels 4 2
Max memory bandwidth 11.92 GB/s 13.41 GB/s
TDP 8 W -
GPU integrated graphics ARM Mali-G72 MP3 ARM Mali-G52 MC2
GPU execution units 3 2
GPU shading units 48 32
GPU clock rate 850 MHz 820 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 86.4 GFLOPS 54.4 GFLOPS
AnTuTu 155,300 183,100
PassMark CPU Mark
11,190 5,820
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
1,645 1,780
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
5,303 5,171
GFLOPS performance
(Multi-core / price performance)
Performance / price ratio
13 pts / $ 18 pts / $
Note 4.3 / 5 -
Reviews 148 -
Amazon Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65
New price on Amazon
- $290
Used price on Amazon
- -
eBay Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65
New price on eBay
$420 $300
Used price on eBay
$290 $200

Price: prices can change over time. For technical reasons, they are not updated in real time. This is only an average of the results on the first page of each product, whether new or used. Shipping costs have not been integrated. To know the final price of the product, please go to the form of the shop. If no price is indicated, it means that we did not find any offers during the last update.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65 is less. Both were produced in the same year.

Ratios: we first consider the average for the new price if available, the average for the used price otherwise. Performance / global cost ratio: This is the ratio of performance on Geekbench 4, divided by the cost of the product + the cost of electricity over 5 years for a duration of use of 13 hours per day.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

AnTuTu - Total score
MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65 183,100
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 155,300

The difference is 18%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

Android PassMark - CPU Mark
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 11,190
MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65 5,820

The difference in performance is 92%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 1,645
MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65 1,780

In single core, the difference is -8%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 3%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 Intel equivalentSamsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 AMD equivalentMediaTek MT6768 Helio P65 Intel equivalentMediaTek MT6768 Helio P65 AMD equivalent

See also:

Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610

Smartphones with the processor Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611:

Samsung Galaxy A50sSamsung Galaxy A51Samsung Galaxy M21Samsung Galaxy M30sSamsung Galaxy M31Samsung Galaxy M31s

Smartphones with the processor MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65:

Samsung Galaxy A31Samsung Galaxy A41Vivo S1Vivo V17 NeoVivo Y19Vivo Y5sVivo Y7s © 2020 - Privacy policy
Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland