GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F


Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 on Amazon USA
HiSilicon Kirin 710F on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 on one side and the HiSilicon Kirin 710F on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.0GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.2 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first broadcast, the maximum number of PCIe lines, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15, as well as an average price.

Specifications:


Processor Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 HiSilicon Kirin 710F
Market Smartphone Smartphone
Family Snapdragon Kirin
Part number(s), S-Spec SM6125 Kirin 710F
Release date Q2 2019 Q3 2018
Lithography 11 nm LPP 12 nm FinFET
Transistors - 5,500,000,000
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 8
Base frequency 1.8 GHz 1.7 GHz
Turbo frequency 2.0 GHz 2.2 GHz
Energy cores 4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Silver @ 1.8 GHz 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.7 GHz
High performance cores 4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Gold @ 2.0 GHz 4x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2.2 GHz
Cache memory 1 MB -
Max memory capacity 8 GB 8 GB
Memory types LPDDR3/LPDDR4X-1866 LPDDR4, LPDDR3
Max # of memory channels 2 2
TDP 5 W 5 W
GPU integrated graphics Qualcomm Adreno 610 ARM Mali-G51 MP4
GPU execution units 2 4
GPU shading units 96 64
GPU base clock rate - 1000 MHz
GPU max clock rate 600 MHz 1000 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 115.2 GFLOPS 83.2 GFLOPS
AnTuTu 142,880 176,140
(Android)
PassMark CPU Mark
13,130 14,330
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
1,507 1,576
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
5,494 5,445
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
36.1 GFLOPS 39 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / price performance)
Performance / price ratio
18 pts / $ 21 pts / $
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
1,099 pts / W 1,089 pts / W
(Multi-core / global cost performance)
Performance / global cost ratio
17 pts / $ 20 pts / $
Note - 4.3 / 5
Reviews - 97
Amazon Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 HiSilicon Kirin 710F
(Average)
New price on Amazon
- -
(Average)
Used price on Amazon
- -
eBay Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 HiSilicon Kirin 710F
(Average)
New price on eBay
- $260
(Average)
Used price on eBay
- $190


Price: prices can change over time. For technical reasons, they are not updated in real time. This is only an average of the results on the first page of each product, whether new or used. Shipping costs have not been integrated. To know the final price of the product, please go to the form of the shop. If no price is indicated, it means that we did not find any offers during the last update.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of HiSilicon Kirin 710F is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 was designed earlier.

Ratios: we first consider the average for the new price if available, the average for the used price otherwise. Performance / global cost ratio: This is the ratio of performance on Geekbench 4, divided by the cost of the product + the cost of electricity over 5 years for a duration of use of 13 hours per day.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


AnTuTu - Total score
HiSilicon Kirin 710F 176,140
Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 142,880


The difference is 23%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark - CPU Mark
HiSilicon Kirin 710F 14,330
Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 13,130


The difference in performance is 9%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 1,507
5,494
HiSilicon Kirin 710F 1,576
5,445


In single core, the difference is -4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


Mobiles with the processor Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665:

Motorola Moto G PowerMotorola Moto G8Motorola Moto G8 PlusMotorola Moto G8 PowerOppo A5 (2020)Oppo A52Oppo A72Oppo A9 (2020)Oppo A92Realme 5Realme 5iRealme 5sSony Xperia 10 IIVivo S1 ProVivo Y50Xiaomi Mi A3Xiaomi Mi CC9eXiaomi Redmi Note 8Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T

Mobiles with the processor HiSilicon Kirin 710F:

Honor 9XHonor 9X LiteHuawei Nova 5iHuawei P Smart Pro 2019Huawei P Smart ZHuawei P40 Lite EHuawei Y7pHuawei Y8pHuawei Y9 Prime (2019)Huawei Y9s


GadgetVersus.com © 2020 - Privacy policy
Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland