GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ vs Intel Xeon Platinum

Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ on Amazon USA
Intel Xeon Platinum on Amazon USA


Compare the technical characteristics between the processor Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ and the group of processors Intel Xeon Platinum, but also with the respective performance in the benchmarks.

Specifications:


Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ 2019 Q3 7 nm FinFET 8 8 1.8 2.96 2 16 10 480000 3730 11018 870
Intel Xeon Platinum P-8136 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 28 56 2 3.7 38.5 768 48 165 84 3705 4166 27920 800
Intel Xeon Platinum 9282 2019 Q2 14 nm 56 112 2.6 3.8 77 2000 40 400 50000
Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 2019 Q2 14 nm 28 56 2.7 4 38.5 1000 48 205 4371 61505 8250
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 28 56 2.5 3.8 38.5 768 48 205 3.6 24 4127 24852 10630
Intel Xeon Platinum 8176 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 28 56 2.1 3.8 38.5 768 48 165 2050 24300 4469 28156 8250
Intel Xeon Platinum 8175 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 24 48 2.5 3.1 33 768 48 165 1600
Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 24 48 2.7 3.7 33 768 48 205 161 4002 2200 28970 3879 60560 6810
Intel Xeon Platinum 8167M 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 26 52 2 2.4 35.75 1536 48 165 2354 50492 790
Intel Xeon Platinum 8124M 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 18 36 3 3.5 24.75 1536 48 200 2080 26690 3954 35420 1090


Price: prices can change over time. For technical reasons, they are not updated in real time. This is only an average of the results on the first page of each product, whether new or used. Shipping costs have not been integrated. To know the final price of the product, please go to the form of the shop. If no price is indicated, it means that we did not find any offers during the last update.

This comparative table allows us to better appreciate the differences between the various processors. The performance for Geekbench 4 single-core and multi-core are established by default on the Windows operating system, on Linux if there is at least one server processor present in the comparison, on Mac OS X if we make a parallel with at least one Apple branded processor on Linux and Android if a smartphone processor other than Apple is present. Each time, in 64-bit version.

For mobile and laptop processors, this is the overall price of the device, as you can not buy the processor alone, at least it is rare.

Ratios: the performance / price ratio takes into account the performance on Geekbench 4 multi-core, divided by the price of the new product recent, used otherwise. The performance / rdp ratio takes into account the performance on Geekbench 4 multi-core, divided by the TDP, ie its electricity consumption. The performance / global cost ratio is even more interesting because it takes into account the price and also a virtual electricity consumption of 13 hours per day, every day, for five years including the cost per kWh.

Performances:

AnTuTu - Total score
Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ 480,000


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 161
4,002
Intel Xeon Platinum P-8136 84
3,705


Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score
Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 4,371
61,505
Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 3,879
60,560
Intel Xeon Platinum 8167M 2,354
50,492
Intel Xeon Platinum 8124M 3,954
35,420
Intel Xeon Platinum 8176 4,469
28,156
Intel Xeon Platinum P-8136 4,166
27,920
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 4,127
24,852
Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ 3,730
11,018


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask EspaƱa W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland