GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ vs HiSilicon Kirin 980


Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ on Amazon USA
HiSilicon Kirin 980 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ on one side and the HiSilicon Kirin 980 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.0GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first broadcast, the maximum number of PCIe lines, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15, as well as an average price.

Specifications:


Processor Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ HiSilicon Kirin 980
Market Smartphone Smartphone
Family Snapdragon Kirin
Part number(s), S-Spec SM8150-AC, SDM855+ Kirin 980
Release date Q3 2019 Q3 2018
Lithography 7 nm FinFET 7 nm FinFET
Transistors - 6,900,000,000
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 8
Base frequency 1.8 GHz 1.8 GHz
Turbo frequency 3.0 GHz 2.6 GHz
Energy cores 4x Kryo 485 Silver @ 1.78 GHz 4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.8 GHz
High performance cores 1x Kryo 485 Gold Prime @ 2.96 GHz
3x Kryo 485 Gold @ 2.42 GHz
4x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.6 GHz
Cache memory 2 MB 2 MB
Max memory capacity 16 GB 8 GB
Memory types LPDDR4X-4266 LPDDR4X-4266
TDP 10 W 6 W
GPU integrated graphics Qualcomm Adreno 640 ARM Mali-G76 MP10
GPU execution units 2 10
GPU shading units 384 160
GPU clock rate 672 MHz 720 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 954.7 GFLOPS 230.4 GFLOPS
AnTuTu 480,000 318,273
(Android)
PassMark CPU Mark
22,890 18,580
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
3,730 3,338
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
11,018 9,822
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
112.9 GFLOPS 102.1 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / price performance)
Performance / price ratio
13 pts / $ 14 pts / $
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
1,102 pts / W 1,637 pts / W
(Multi-core / global cost performance)
Performance / global cost ratio
12 pts / $ 14 pts / $
Note - 4.5 / 5
Reviews - 1,845
Amazon Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ HiSilicon Kirin 980
(Average)
New price on Amazon
- $680
(Average)
Used price on Amazon
- $470
eBay Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ HiSilicon Kirin 980
(Average)
New price on eBay
- $620
(Average)
Used price on eBay
- $460


Price: prices can change over time. For technical reasons, they are not updated in real time. This is only an average of the results on the first page of each product, whether new or used. Shipping costs have not been integrated. To know the final price of the product, please go to the form of the shop. If no price is indicated, it means that we did not find any offers during the last update.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of HiSilicon Kirin 980 is less. The Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ was designed earlier.

Ratios: we first consider the average for the new price if available, the average for the used price otherwise. Performance / global cost ratio: This is the ratio of performance on Geekbench 4, divided by the cost of the product + the cost of electricity over 5 years for a duration of use of 13 hours per day.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


AnTuTu - Total score
Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ 480,000
HiSilicon Kirin 980 318,273


The difference is 51%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark - CPU Mark
Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ 22,890
HiSilicon Kirin 980 18,580


The difference in performance is 23%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ 3,730
11,018
HiSilicon Kirin 980 3,338
9,822


In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 12%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


Mobiles with the processor Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+:

Asus ROG Phone II ZS660KLOnePlus 7TOnePlus 7T ProRealme X2 ProXiaomi Black Shark 2 ProXiaomi Mi 9 ProXiaomi Mi 9 Pro 5GXiaomi Mi Mix AlphaZTE nubia Red Magic 3S

Mobiles with the processor HiSilicon Kirin 980:

Honor 20Honor 20 ProHonor View 20Huawei Mate 20Huawei Mate 20 ProHuawei Mate 20 XHuawei Nova 5 ProHuawei Nova 5THuawei P30Huawei P30 Pro

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland