GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ vs HiSilicon Kirin 970


Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ on Amazon USA
HiSilicon Kirin 970 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ on one side and the HiSilicon Kirin 970 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.0GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first broadcast, the maximum number of PCIe lines, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15, as well as an average price.

Specifications:


Processor Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ HiSilicon Kirin 970
Market Smartphone Smartphone
Family Snapdragon Kirin
Part number(s), S-Spec SM8150-AC, SDM855+ Kirin 970
Release date Q3 2019 Q3 2017
Lithography 7 nm FinFET 10 nm FinFET+
Transistors - 5,500,000,000
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 8
Base frequency 1.8 GHz 1.8 GHz
Turbo frequency 3.0 GHz 2.4 GHz
Energy cores 4x Kryo 485 Silver @ 1.78 GHz 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.84 GHz
High performance cores 1x Kryo 485 Gold Prime @ 2.96 GHz
3x Kryo 485 Gold @ 2.42 GHz
4x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2.36 GHz
Cache memory 2 MB 2 MB
Max memory capacity 16 GB 8 GB
Memory types LPDDR4X-4266 LPDDR4X-3732
TDP 10 W 9 W
GPU integrated graphics Qualcomm Adreno 640 ARM Mali-G72 MP12
GPU execution units 2 12
GPU shading units 384 192
GPU clock rate 672 MHz 746 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 954.7 GFLOPS 286.5 GFLOPS
AnTuTu 480,000 205,987
(Android)
PassMark CPU Mark
22,890 12,540
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
3,730 1,890
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
11,018 6,648
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
112.9 GFLOPS 47.4 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / price performance)
Performance / price ratio
13 pts / $ 9 pts / $
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
1,102 pts / W 739 pts / W
(Multi-core / global cost performance)
Performance / global cost ratio
12 pts / $ 8 pts / $
Note - 4.5 / 5
Reviews - 4,654
Amazon Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ HiSilicon Kirin 970
(Average)
New price on Amazon
- $780
(Average)
Used price on Amazon
- -
eBay Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ HiSilicon Kirin 970
(Average)
New price on eBay
- $400
(Average)
Used price on eBay
- $260


Price: prices can change over time. For technical reasons, they are not updated in real time. This is only an average of the results on the first page of each product, whether new or used. Shipping costs have not been integrated. To know the final price of the product, please go to the form of the shop. If no price is indicated, it means that we did not find any offers during the last update.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of HiSilicon Kirin 970 is less. The Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ was designed earlier.

Ratios: we first consider the average for the new price if available, the average for the used price otherwise. Performance / global cost ratio: This is the ratio of performance on Geekbench 4, divided by the cost of the product + the cost of electricity over 5 years for a duration of use of 13 hours per day.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


AnTuTu - Total score
Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ 480,000
HiSilicon Kirin 970 205,987


The difference is 133%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark - CPU Mark
Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ 22,890
HiSilicon Kirin 970 12,540


The difference in performance is 83%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ 3,730
11,018
HiSilicon Kirin 970 1,890
6,648


In single core, the difference is 97%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 66%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


Mobiles with the processor Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+:

Asus ROG Phone II ZS660KLOnePlus 7TOnePlus 7T ProRealme X2 ProXiaomi Black Shark 2 ProXiaomi Mi 9 ProXiaomi Mi 9 Pro 5GXiaomi Mi Mix AlphaZTE nubia Red Magic 3S

Mobiles with the processor HiSilicon Kirin 970:

Honor 10Honor PlayHonor View 10Huawei Mate 10Huawei Mate 10 ProHuawei Nova 3Huawei Nova 4Huawei P20Huawei P20 Pro

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland