Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835


Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 on Amazon USA


Technical specifications and performance with the benchmarks of the Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 processor dedicated to the smartphone sector, it has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.5GHz. The table below makes it possible to observe well the lithography, the number of transistors (if present), the offered cache memory, the maximum capacity of RAM memory that we can get, the type of compatible memory, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in the Passmark platform, Cinebench and Geekbench.






Specifications:


ProcessorQualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835
Market (main)Smartphone
ISAARMv8-A (64-bit)
MicroarchitectureCortex-A73, Cortex-A53
Core nameCortex-A73, Cortex-A53
FamilySnapdragon 800
Part number(s), S-Spec

APQ8098, MSM8998
Release dateQ2 2017
Lithography10 nm FinFET LPE
Transistors3,000,000,000
Cores8
Threads8
Base frequency1.9 GHz
Turbo frequency2.45 GHz
Energy cores

4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.9 GHz
High performance cores

4x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2.45 GHz
Cache memory2 MB
Max memory capacity6 GB
Memory types

LPDDR4X-1866
Max # of memory channels2
Max memory bandwidth29.8 GB/s
TDP9 W
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 540
GPU execution units2
GPU shading units256
GPU base clock670 MHz
GPU boost clock710 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point737 GFLOPS
SocketSoC
AnTuTu199,273
PassMark CPU Mark1,213
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
1,855
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
6,324
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
374
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
1,464
(Android)
Geekbench 6 single core
406
(Android)
Geekbench 6 multi-core
1,367
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS Performance
44 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
703 pts / W
Amazon
eBay



Performance with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between this processor and those of equivalent power, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.




Performance comparison with the AnTuTu benchmark platform for mobile devices:


AnTuTu - Total Score
MediaTek MT6779 Helio P90 207,187
MediaTek MT6769T Helio G80 203,080
Unisoc Tiger T7510 201,334
Unisoc Tiger T606 200,722
MediaTek MT6769V Helio G70 199,400
Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 199,273
MediaTek MT8786 188,547
Unisoc UIS7862A 183,647
Unisoc Tiger T610 182,349
Qualcomm SM6150 Snapdragon 675 181,603



AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.




Performance comparison with the Passmark benchmark platform for processors:


Android PassMark - CPU Mark
MediaTek MT6765V/WA Helio P35 1,385
MediaTek Helio G36 1,344
MediaTek MT6762V/WBB Helio A25 1,334
MediaTek MT6762D Helio P22 1,314
Nvidia Tegra X1+ T214 1,250
Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 1,213
MediaTek MT6771 Helio P70M 1,098
MediaTek MT6762V/CR Helio P22 1,043
MediaTek MT6762V/CA Helio P22 1,035
MediaTek MT6762G Helio G25 1,023



PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android: performance comparison with Geekbench 4 and the Android operating system.


Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
MediaTek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 2,449
6,655
Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G 2,486
6,572
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ 2,431
6,540
Qualcomm SM7150-AC Snapdragon 732G 2,387
6,447
MediaTek MT6785 Helio G95 2,475
6,381
Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 1,855
6,324
Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G 2,291
6,315
MediaTek MT6853V Dimensity 720 2,264
6,298
Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G 1,835
6,291
MediaTek MT6779V Helio P95 1,867
6,262





With Windows: performance comparison with Geekbench 4 and the Windows operating system.


Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U 2,355
6,723
Intel Core i5-8210Y 2,646
6,715
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 2,452
6,342
AMD Athlon 300U 3,193
6,143
Intel Core i5-L16G7 3,801
6,099
Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 1,773
6,088
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e 2,894
6,087
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y 3,435
6,066
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U 3,054
5,874
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 2,200
5,817



Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.




With Android: performance comparison with Geekbench 5 and the Android operating system.


Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
MediaTek MT6785 Helio G95 496
1,573
Qualcomm SM6150 Snapdragon 675 494
1,551
Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G 380
1,532
MediaTek MT6779V Helio P95 398
1,497
Qualcomm SDM712 Snapdragon 712 403
1,477
Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 374
1,464
Unisoc UMS9230 376
1,460
MediaTek MT8786 392
1,458
Unisoc Tiger T616 365
1,435
MediaTek MT6771V Helio P70 297
1,406



Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.




With Android: performance comparison with Geekbench 6 and the Android operating system.


Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Unisoc Tiger T616 446
1,505
Unisoc Tiger T710 413
1,477
Unisoc Tiger T612 414
1,466
Qualcomm SM6225-AD Snapdragon 685 4G 456
1,453
Unisoc Tiger T610 425
1,401
Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 406
1,367
Unisoc Tiger T606 371
1,360
MediaTek MT6769V/CZ Helio G85 420
1,357
Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G 396
1,355
Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 5G 695
1,353



Geekbench 6 is a benchmarking platform that is capable of evaluating the performance of a device across multiple operating systems. The software evaluates processor power, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, browsing; GPU computing capabilities, with image editing, video editing, gaming skills, machine learning workloads.

List of benchmarks:

AnTuTuGeekbench 4 AndroidGeekbench 4 WindowsGeekbench 5 AndroidGeekbench 6 AndroidPassMarkGFLOPS Performance

Equivalence:

Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 Intel EquivalentQualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 AMD Equivalent

Smartphones with the processor Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835:

Essential PH-1Google Pixel 2Google Pixel 2 XLHTC U11HTC U11+LG G7 OneLG V30LG V30+Motorola Moto Z2 ForceMotorola Moto Z3Nokia 8Nokia 8 SiroccoOnePlus 5OnePlus 5TRazer PhoneSamsung Galaxy Note8 SD835Samsung Galaxy S8 SD835Samsung Galaxy S8+ SD835Sony Xperia XZ PremiumSony Xperia XZ1Sony Xperia XZ1 CompactXiaomi Mi 6Xiaomi Mi Mix 2ZTE nubia Red Magic




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.