Microsoft vs Microsoft SQ1
Compare the technical characteristics between the group of processors Microsoft and the processor Microsoft SQ1, but also with the respective performance in the benchmarks.
Specifications:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Microsoft SQ1 |
2019 Q3 |
7 nm |
8 |
8 |
1.8 |
3 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
9 |
3.4 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3492 |
11493 |
|
|
|
|
|
1250 |
Price: prices can change over time. For technical reasons, they are not updated in real time. This is only an average of the results on the first page of each product, whether new or used. Shipping costs have not been integrated. To know the final price of the product, please go to the form of the shop. If no price is indicated, it means that we did not find any offers during the last update.
This comparative table allows us to better appreciate the differences between the various processors. The performance for Geekbench 4 single-core and multi-core are established by default on the Windows operating system, on Linux if there is at least one server processor present in the comparison, on Mac OS X if we make a parallel with at least one Apple branded processor on Linux and Android if a smartphone processor other than Apple is present. Each time, in 64-bit version.
For mobile and laptop processors, this is the overall price of the device, as you can not buy the processor alone, at least it is rare.
Ratios: the performance / price ratio takes into account the performance on Geekbench 4 multi-core, divided by the price of the new product recent, used otherwise. The performance / rdp ratio takes into account the performance on Geekbench 4 multi-core, divided by the TDP, ie its electricity consumption. The performance / global cost ratio is even more interesting because it takes into account the price and also a virtual electricity consumption of 13 hours per day, every day, for five years including the cost per kWh.
Performances:
|
Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score |
|
Microsoft SQ1 |
3,492
11,493 |
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
FR