FR
MediaTek MT8183 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the MediaTek MT8183 on one side and the Unisoc Tiger T618 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the tablet sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.0GHz. The second is used on the tablet segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | MediaTek MT8183 | Unisoc Tiger T618 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Tablet | Tablet | ||||||
| ISA | ARMv8 (64-bit) | ARMv8.2-A (64-bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Cortex-A73, Cortex-A53 | Cortex-A75, Cortex-A55 | ||||||
| Family | Octa-core | Tiger | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | MT8183 | Tiger T618 | ||||||
| Release date | Q4 2019 | Q3 2019 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm FF | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 1.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 2.0 GHz | 2.0 GHz | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.6 GHz | 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.8 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2.0 GHz | 2x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2.0 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 1 MB | 2 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3, LPDDR4 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| TDP | 10 W | 10 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G72 MP3 | ARM Mali-G52 MP2 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 3 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 48 | 32 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 800 MHz | 850 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 800 MHz | 950 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 86.4 GFLOPS | 54.4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | SoC | SoC | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 1,397 | 1,904 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 4,863 | 5,889 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 286 | 392 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 1,344 | 1,294 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 14.2 GFLOPS | 41.68 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 486 pts / W | 589 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that their respective TDP are of the same order. Both were produced in the same year.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
Unisoc Tiger T618 |
1,904 5,889 |
| MediaTek MT8183 |
1,397 4,863 |
In single core, the difference is 36%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 21%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| MediaTek MT8183 |
286 1,344 |
| Unisoc Tiger T618 |
392 1,294 |
In single core, the difference is -27%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 4%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
MediaTek MT8183 Intel equivalentMediaTek MT8183 AMD equivalentUnisoc Tiger T618 Intel equivalentUnisoc Tiger T618 AMD equivalentSee also:
MediaTek MT8183CMediaTek MT8183VUnisoc Tiger T610Unisoc Tiger T612Unisoc Tiger T616
Smartphones with the processor Unisoc Tiger T618:
Advan GXDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.