• Home page
•       Processor
•       Comparison

MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65 on one side and the Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.0GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.3 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Specifications:

Processor		MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65				Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611
Market		Smartphone				Smartphone
Family		Helio P				Exynos
Part number(s), S-Spec		P65, MT6768				Exynos 7 Octa 9611, s5E9611
Release date		Q3 2019				Q3 2019
Lithography		12 nm HPM				10 nm LPE
Cores		8				8
Threads		8				8
Base frequency		1.7 GHz				1.7 GHz
Turbo frequency		2.0 GHz				2.3 GHz
Energy cores		6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.7 GHz				4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.7 GHz
High performance cores		2x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2.0 GHz				4x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2.3 GHz
Cache memory		2 MB				2 MB
Max memory capacity		8 GB				6 GB
Memory types		LPDDR3-1866				LPDDR4X
Max # of memory channels		2				4
Max memory bandwidth		13.41 GB/s				11.92 GB/s
TDP		5 W				8 W
GPU integrated graphics		ARM Mali-G52 MC2				ARM Mali-G72 MP3
GPU execution units		2				3
GPU shading units		32				48
GPU clock rate		820 MHz				850 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point		54.4 GFLOPS				86.4 GFLOPS
Socket		SoC				SoC
AnTuTu		183,100				155,300
(Android) PassMark CPU Mark		2,281				1,958
(Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core		1,780				1,645
(Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core		5,171				5,303
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance		40.4 GFLOPS				34.9 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio		1,034 pts / W				663 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 is bigger, that the PDT of MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65 is lower. Both were produced in the same year.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	AnTuTu - Total score
MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65#ad	183,100
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611#ad	155,300

The difference is 18%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

	Android PassMark - CPU Mark
MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65#ad	2,281
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611#ad	1,958

The difference in performance is 16%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.



On Android 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611#ad	1,645 5,303
MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65#ad	1,780 5,171

In single core, the difference is 8%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 3%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65 Intel equivalentMediaTek MT6768 Helio P65 AMD equivalentSamsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 Intel equivalentSamsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 AMD equivalent

See also:

Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610

Smartphones with the processor MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65:

Samsung Galaxy A31Samsung Galaxy A41Vivo S1Vivo V17 NeoVivo Y19Vivo Y5sVivo Y7s

Smartphones with the processor Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611:

Samsung Galaxy A50sSamsung Galaxy A51Samsung Galaxy F41Samsung Galaxy M21Samsung Galaxy M21sSamsung Galaxy M30sSamsung Galaxy M31Samsung Galaxy M31s