MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65 on one side and the Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.0GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.3 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | |
MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65 |
| | |
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 |
| |
Market | |
Smartphone |
| | |
Smartphone |
| |
Family | |
Helio P |
| | |
Exynos |
| |
Part number(s), S-Spec | |
P65, MT6768 |
| | |
Exynos 7 Octa 9611, s5E9611 |
| |
Release date | |
Q3 2019 |
| | |
Q3 2019 |
| |
Lithography | |
12 nm HPM |
| | |
10 nm LPE |
| |
Cores | |
8 |
| | |
8 |
| |
Threads | |
8 |
| | |
8 |
| |
Base frequency | |
1.7 GHz |
| | |
1.7 GHz |
| |
Turbo frequency | |
2.0 GHz |
| | |
2.3 GHz |
| |
Energy cores | |
6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.7 GHz |
| | |
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.7 GHz |
| |
High performance cores | |
2x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2.0 GHz |
| | |
4x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2.3 GHz |
| |
Cache memory | |
2 MB |
| | |
2 MB |
| |
Max memory capacity | |
8 GB |
| | |
6 GB |
| |
Memory types | |
LPDDR3-1866 |
| | |
LPDDR4X |
| |
Max # of memory channels | |
2 |
| | |
4 |
| |
Max memory bandwidth | |
13.41 GB/s |
| | |
11.92 GB/s |
| |
TDP | |
- |
| | |
8 W |
| |
GPU integrated graphics | |
ARM Mali-G52 MC2 |
| | |
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 |
| |
GPU execution units | |
2 |
| | |
3 |
| |
GPU shading units | |
32 |
| | |
48 |
| |
GPU clock rate | |
820 MHz |
| | |
850 MHz |
| |
GPU FP32 floating point | |
54.4 GFLOPS |
| | |
86.4 GFLOPS |
| |
AnTuTu | |
183,100 |
| | |
155,300 |
| |
(Android) PassMark CPU Mark | |
5,820 |
| | |
11,190 |
| |
(Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | |
1,780 |
| | |
1,645 |
| |
(Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | |
5,171 |
| | |
5,303 |
| |
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | |
40.4 GFLOPS |
| | |
34.9 GFLOPS |
| |
Amazon | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
eBay | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 is bigger, that the PDT of MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65 is lower. Both were produced in the same year.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
The difference is 18%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
The difference in performance is 92%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 8%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 3%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65 Intel equivalentMediaTek MT6768 Helio P65 AMD equivalentSamsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 Intel equivalentSamsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 AMD equivalentSee also:
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610Smartphones with the processor MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65:
Samsung Galaxy A31Samsung Galaxy A41Vivo S1Vivo V17 NeoVivo Y19Vivo Y5sVivo Y7sSmartphones with the processor Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611:
Samsung Galaxy A50sSamsung Galaxy A51Samsung Galaxy F41Samsung Galaxy M21Samsung Galaxy M30sSamsung Galaxy M31Samsung Galaxy M31s