Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 on one side and the Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.0GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first broadcast, the maximum number of PCIe lines, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15, as well as an average price.
Specifications:
| Processor | |
Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 |
| | |
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 |
| |
| Market | |
Smartphone |
| | |
Smartphone |
| |
| Family | |
Helio P |
| | |
Exynos |
| |
| Part number(s), S-Spec | |
P22, MT6762 |
| | |
Exynos 7 Octa 7884,
Lassen-P+ |
| |
| Release date | |
Q2 2018 |
| | |
Q1 2018 |
| |
| Lithography | |
12 nm |
| | |
14nm FinFET |
| |
| Cores | |
8 |
| | |
8 |
| |
| Threads | |
8 |
| | |
8 |
| |
| Base frequency | |
2.0 GHz |
| | |
1.4 GHz |
| |
| Turbo frequency | |
- |
| | |
1.6 GHz |
| |
| Energy cores | |
- |
| | |
6x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.35 GHz |
| |
| High performance cores | |
8x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz |
| | |
2x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 1.6 GHz |
| |
| Cache memory | |
2 MB |
| | |
2 MB |
| |
| Max memory capacity | |
6 GB |
| | |
3 GB |
| |
| Memory types | |
LPDDR4X-3200, LPDDR3-1866 |
| | |
LPDDR4 |
| |
| TDP | |
5 W |
| | |
5 W |
| |
| GPU integrated graphics | |
Imagination PowerVR GE8320 |
| | |
ARM Mali-G71 MP2 |
| |
| GPU execution units | |
2 |
| | |
2 |
| |
| GPU shading units | |
64 |
| | |
32 |
| |
| GPU clock rate | |
650 MHz |
| | |
1,300 MHz |
| |
| GPU FP32 floating point | |
41.6 GFLOPS |
| | |
49.3 GFLOPS |
| |
| AnTuTu | |
75,140 |
| | |
88,710 |
| |
(Android)
PassMark CPU Mark | |
97,630 |
| | |
111,150 |
| |
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core | |
817 |
| | |
1,089 |
| |
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core | |
3,585 |
| | |
3,422 |
| |
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance | |
10.1 GFLOPS |
| | |
23.4 GFLOPS |
| |
(Multi-core / price performance)
Performance / price ratio | |
26 pts / $ |
| | |
21 pts / $ |
| |
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio | |
717 pts / W |
| | |
684 pts / W |
| |
(Multi-core / global cost performance)
Performance / global cost ratio | |
23 pts / $ |
| | |
20 pts / $ |
| |
| Note | |
4.2 / 5 |
| | |
4.2 / 5 |
| |
| Reviews | |
237 |
| | |
67 |
| |
| Amazon | |
Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 |
| | |
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 |
| |
(Average)
New price on Amazon | |
- |
| | |
$160 |
| |
(Average)
Used price on Amazon | |
- |
| | |
- |
| |
| eBay | |
Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 |
| | |
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 |
| |
(Average)
New price on eBay | |
- |
| | |
$180 |
| |
(Average)
Used price on eBay | |
- |
| | |
$180 |
| |
Price: prices can change over time. For technical reasons, they are not updated in real time. This is only an average of the results on the first page of each product, whether new or used. Shipping costs have not been integrated. To know the final price of the product, please go to the form of the shop. If no price is indicated, it means that we did not find any offers during the last update.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. Both were produced in the same year.
Ratios: we first consider the average for the new price if available, the average for the used price otherwise. Performance / global cost ratio: This is the ratio of performance on Geekbench 4, divided by the cost of the product + the cost of electricity over 5 years for a duration of use of 13 hours per day.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
The difference is 18%.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
The difference in performance is 14%.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is -25%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 5%.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Mobiles with the processor Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22:
Infinix S5Infinix S5 LiteLG W10LG W30Motorola Moto E6 PlusSamsung Galaxy A10sXiaomi Redmi 6Mobiles with the processor Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884:
Samsung Galaxy A10Samsung Galaxy A10eSamsung Galaxy A20Samsung Galaxy A20e
FR