FR
MediaTek Helio G70 vs MediaTek MT6762 Helio P22
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the MediaTek Helio G70 on one side and the MediaTek MT6762 Helio P22 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.0GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G70 | MediaTek MT6762 Helio P22 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Smartphone | Smartphone | ||||||
| ISA | ARMv8.2-A (64-bit) | ARMv8-A (64-bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Cortex-A75, Cortex-A55 | Cortex-A53 | ||||||
| Family | Helio G | Helio P | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | Helio G70 | P22, MT6762 | ||||||
| Release date | Q1 2020 | Q2 2018 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm FFC | 12 nm | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 1.7 GHz | 2.0 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 2.0 GHz | - | ||||||
| Energy cores | 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.7 GHz | - | ||||||
| High performance cores | 2x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2.0 GHz | 8x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 2 MB | 2 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 6 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | LPDDR4x-1800 | LPDDR4X-3200, LPDDR3-1866 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| TDP | 5 W | 5 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G52 MC2 | Imagination PowerVR GE8320 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 32 | 64 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 820 MHz | 650 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 54.4 GFLOPS | 41.6 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | SoC | SoC | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 173,990 | 75,140 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 1,810 | 817 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 5,655 | 3,585 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 46.5 GFLOPS | 10.1 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 1,131 pts / W | 717 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The MediaTek Helio G70 was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
MediaTek Helio G70 |
173,990 |
| MediaTek MT6762 Helio P22 |
75,140 |
The difference is 132%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| MediaTek Helio G70 |
1,810 5,655 |
| MediaTek MT6762 Helio P22 |
817 3,585 |
In single core, the difference is 122%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 58%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
MediaTek Helio G70 Intel equivalentMediaTek Helio G70 AMD equivalentMediaTek MT6762 Helio P22 Intel equivalentMediaTek MT6762 Helio P22 AMD equivalentSmartphones with the processor MediaTek Helio G70:
Infinix Hot 10Infinix Hot 10TInfinix Note 7Realme C25Realme C3Realme Narzo 10ATecno Camon 16Tecno Camon 16 ProTecno Spark 6Smartphones with the processor MediaTek MT6762 Helio P22:
Alcatel 3L (2020)Infinix Hot 9 ProInfinix Note 7 LiteInfinix S4Infinix S5Infinix S5 LiteLG K40LG K40SLG K41SLG K42LG K50LG K50SLG K51LG Q60LG W10LG W30Motorola Moto E6 PlusMotorola Moto E6sMotorola Moto E6s (2020)Nokia 2.4Nokia 3.1 Plus (MediaTek)Oppo A1kRealme C2Realme C2 2020Realme C2sSamsung Galaxy A10sSamsung Galaxy M01sSony Xperia L4TCL 10 SETecno Camon 12Tecno Camon 12 ProTecno Camon 15Tecno Camon 15 AirTecno Camon 16 STecno Pouvoir 4 ProUlefone Note 9PVivo Y12Vivo Y15 (2019)Vivo Y81Vivo Y91CXiaomi Redmi 6ZTE Blade A7 2020ZTE Blade A7sDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.