Intel Xeon W-3175X vs Intel Core i9-10900X


Intel Xeon W-3175X on Amazon USA
Intel Core i9-10900X on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Xeon W-3175X on one side and the Intel Core i9-10900X on the other side. The first is dedicated to the very high-end desktop computer sector, It has 28 cores, 56 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.3GHz. The second is used on the high-end desktop computer segment, it has a total of 10 cores, 20 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4.5 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.






Specifications:


Processor Intel Xeon W-3175X Intel Core i9-10900X
Market (main) Very high-end desktop computer High-end desktop computer
ISA x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture Skylake Cascade Lake
Core name Skylake-W Cascade Lake-X
Family Xeon W-3100 Core i9-10000
Part number(s), S-Spec BX80673W3175X,
CD8067304237800,
SRF6L
BX8069510900X,
BXC8069510900X,
CD8069504382100,
SRGV7
Release date Q1 2019 Q4 2019
Lithography 14 nm++ 14 nm+++
Cores 28 10
Threads 56 20
Base frequency 3.1 GHz 3.7 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.3 GHz 4.5 GHz
Bus speed 8 GT/s 8 GT/s
Cache memory 38.5 MB 19.25 MB
Max memory capacity 512 GB 256 GB
Memory types DDR4-2666 DDR4-2933
Max # of memory channels 6 4
Max memory bandwidth 119.21 GB/s 94 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes 48 48
TDP 255 W 165 W
Suggested PSU 750W ATX Power Supply 700W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics None None
Socket LGA3647 LGA2066
Compatible motherboard Socket LGA 3647 Motherboard  Socket LGA 2066 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature 85°C 94°C
CPU-Z single thread 531 547
CPU-Z multi thread 18,413 6,662
Cinebench R15 single thread 188 200
Cinebench R15 multi-thread 5,530 2,360
Cinebench R23 single thread 996 1,132
Cinebench R23 multi-thread 31,233 14,290
PassMark single thread 2,236 2,702
PassMark CPU Mark 36,359 22,827
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
5,507 5,279
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
59,993 36,287
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 single core
1,211 1,154
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
18,799 10,359
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
2,295 GFLOPS 1,019.4 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
235 pts / W 220 pts / W
Amazon
eBay



We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Intel Xeon W-3175X has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i9-10900X is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i9-10900X is less. Both were produced in the same year.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


CPU-Z - Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Xeon W-3175X 531
18,413
Intel Core i9-10900X 547
6,662


In single core, the difference is -3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 176%.


CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.


Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Xeon W-3175X 188
5,530
Intel Core i9-10900X 200
2,360


In single core, the difference is -6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 134%.


Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


Cinebench R23 - Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Xeon W-3175X 996
31,233
Intel Core i9-10900X 1,132
14,290


In single core, the difference is -12%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 119%.


Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.


PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Xeon W-3175X 2,236
36,359
Intel Core i9-10900X 2,702
22,827


In single core, the difference is -17%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 59%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.





On Windows 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
Intel Xeon W-3175X 5,507
59,993
Intel Core i9-10900X 5,279
36,287


In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 65%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Mac OS X 64-bit
Intel Xeon W-3175X 5,292
95,930
Intel Core i9-10900X 5,592
44,064


In single core, the difference is -5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 118%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


On Windows:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows
Intel Xeon W-3175X 1,211
18,799
Intel Core i9-10900X 1,154
10,359


In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 81%.

On Linux:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux
Intel Xeon W-3175X 1,236
22,825
Intel Core i9-10900X 1,248
11,788


In single core, the difference is -1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 94%.

On macOS:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - macOS
Intel Xeon W-3175X 1,110
23,052
Intel Core i9-10900X 1,148
10,762


In single core, the difference is -3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 114%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.


Equivalence:

Intel Xeon W-3175X AMD equivalentIntel Core i9-10900X AMD equivalent

See also:

Intel Core i9-10900Intel Core i9-10900FIntel Core i9-10900KIntel Core i9-10900KAIntel Core i9-10900KFIntel Core i9-10900KSIntel Core i9-10900T




GadgetVersus.com © 2021 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland