GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


Intel Xeon Platinum vs HiSilicon Kirin 970

Intel Xeon Platinum on Amazon USA
HiSilicon Kirin 970 on Amazon USA


Compare the technical characteristics between le groupe de processeurs Intel Xeon Platinum and le processeur HiSilicon Kirin 970, but also with the respective performance in the benchmarks.

Specifications:


Quad Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M 2017 Q3 14nm+ 112 224 2.5 3.8 154 6000 192 820 2080 48900 4713 150243 33230
Quad Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 112 224 2.5 3.8 154 3072 192 820 3.6 24 84 10551 1850 44140 4194 138862 42500
Quad Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 96 192 2.7 3.7 132 3072 192 820 4255 125731 27220
Octa Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 192 384 2.7 3.7 264 6144 384 1640 4100 135289 54450
Intel Xeon Platinum P-8136 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 28 56 2 3.7 38.5 768 48 165 84 3705 4166 27920 800
Intel Xeon Platinum 9282 2019 Q2 14 nm 56 112 2.6 3.8 77 2000 40 400 50000
Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 2019 Q2 14 nm 28 56 2.7 4 38.5 1000 48 205 4371 61505 8250
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 28 56 2.5 3.8 38.5 768 48 205 3.6 24 4127 24852 10630
Intel Xeon Platinum 8176 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 28 56 2.1 3.8 38.5 768 48 165 2050 30580 4469 28156 8250
Intel Xeon Platinum 8175 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 24 48 2.5 3.1 33 768 48 165 1600
Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 24 48 2.7 3.7 33 768 48 205 161 4002 2070 29130 3879 60560 6810
Intel Xeon Platinum 8167M 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 26 52 2 2.4 35.75 1536 48 165 2354 50492 610
Intel Xeon Platinum 8124M 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 18 36 3 3.5 24.75 1536 48 200 1970 26840 3954 35420 1090
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2017 Q3 10 nm FinFET+ 8 8 1.84 2.36 2 8 9 4.5 4654 205987 1890 6648 760
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum P-8136 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 56 112 2 3.7 77 1536 96 330 84 6009 3210 22485 1600
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 9282 2019 Q2 14 nm 112 224 2.6 3.8 154 4000 80 800 100000
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 2019 Q2 14 nm 56 112 2.7 4 77 2000 96 410 90 7193 4301 109442 16490
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M 2017 Q3 14nm+ 56 112 2.5 3.8 77 3000 96 410 84 8389 4309 100539 16620
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 56 112 2.5 3.8 77 1536 96 410 3.6 24 84 6580 2000 34590 4642 118496 21250
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8176 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 56 112 2.1 3.8 77 1536 96 330 80 6525 4411 28678 16500
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M 2017 Q3 14nm+ 48 96 2.5 3.5 66 3072 96 480 84 6975 1790 36070 4090
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 48 96 2.7 3.7 66 1536 96 410 154 7084 2060 39260 3973 90190 13610
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8167M 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 52 104 2 2.4 71.5 3072 96 330 3092 93126 1230
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8124M 2017 Q3 14 nm+ 36 72 3 3.5 49.5 3072 96 400 1960 36110 4312 88220 2180


Price: prices can change over time. For technical reasons, they are not updated in real time. This is only an average of the results on the first page of each product, whether new or used. Shipping costs have not been integrated. To know the final price of the product, please go to the form of the shop. If no price is indicated, it means that we did not find any offers during the last update.

This comparative table allows us to better appreciate the differences between the various processors. The performance for Geekbench 4 single-core and multi-core are established by default on the Windows operating system, on Linux if there is at least one server processor present in the comparison, on Mac OS X if we make a parallel with at least one Apple branded processor on Linux and Android if a smartphone processor other than Apple is present. Each time, in 64-bit version.

For mobile and laptop processors, this is the overall price of the device, as you can not buy the processor alone, at least it is rare.

Ratios: the performance / price ratio takes into account the performance on Geekbench 4 multi-core, divided by the price of the new product recent, used otherwise. The performance / rdp ratio takes into account the performance on Geekbench 4 multi-core, divided by the TDP, ie its electricity consumption. The performance / global cost ratio is even more interesting because it takes into account the price and also a virtual electricity consumption of 13 hours per day, every day, for five years including the cost per kWh.

Performances:


AnTuTu - Total score
HiSilicon Kirin 970 205,987


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score
Quad Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 84
10,551
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M 84
8,389
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 90
7,193
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 154
7,084
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M 84
6,975
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 84
6,580
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8176 80
6,525
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum P-8136 84
6,009
Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 161
4,002
Intel Xeon Platinum P-8136 84
3,705


Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score
Quad Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M 4,713
150,243
Quad Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 4,194
138,862
Octa Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 4,100
135,289
Quad Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 4,255
125,731
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 4,642
118,496
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 4,301
109,442
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M 4,309
100,539
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8167M 3,092
93,126
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 3,973
90,190
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8124M 4,312
88,220
Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 4,371
61,505
Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 3,879
60,560
Intel Xeon Platinum 8167M 2,354
50,492
Intel Xeon Platinum 8124M 3,954
35,420
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8176 4,411
28,678


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask EspaƱa W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland