GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


Intel Pentium Gold 4417U vs Nvidia Tegra X2 T186


Intel Pentium Gold 4417U on Amazon USA
Nvidia Tegra X2 T186 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Pentium Gold 4417U on one side and the Nvidia Tegra X2 T186 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, It has 2 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.3GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 6 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first broadcast, the maximum number of PCIe lines, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15, as well as an average price.

Specifications:


Processor Intel Pentium Gold 4417U Nvidia Tegra X2 T186
Market Laptop Desktop
Family Kaby Lake R Tegra
Part number(s), S-Spec FJ8067703282813,
SRESH
Tegra X2 T186, Parker
Release date Q1 2019 Q3 2016
Lithography 14 nm++ 16 nm FinFET
Cores 2 6
Threads 4 6
Base frequency 2.3 GHz 1.2 GHz
Turbo frequency - 2.0 GHz
Energy cores - 4x ARM Cortex-A57 @ 1.2 - 2.0 GHz
High performance cores - 2x Nvidia Denver2 @ 1.4 - 2.0 GHz
Cache memory 2 MB 512 KB
Max memory capacity 32 GB 8 GB
Memory types DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866,
DDR3L-1600
LPDDR4
Max # of memory channels 2 2
Max memory bandwidth 34.1 GB/s 59.7 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes 12 4
TDP 15 W 15 W
GPU integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 610 Mobile NVIDIA Tegra X2 Pascal GPU
GPU execution units 12 1
GPU shading units 96 256
GPU base clock rate 300 MHz 854 MHz
GPU max clock rate 950 MHz 1,475 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 172.8 GFLOPS 750.1 GFLOPS
Socket BGA1356 SoC
(Windows 64-bit | Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,572 1,855
(Windows 64-bit | Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
5,021 6,314
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
30.3 GFLOPS 49.5 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / price performance)
Performance / price ratio
11 pts / $ 13 pts / $
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
335 pts / W 421 pts / W
(Multi-core / global cost performance)
Performance / global cost ratio
10 pts / $ 12 pts / $
Note 4.4 / 5 3.7 / 5
Reviews 476 25
Amazon Intel Pentium Gold 4417U Nvidia Tegra X2 T186
(Average)
New price on Amazon
- -
(Average)
Used price on Amazon
- -
eBay Intel Pentium Gold 4417U Nvidia Tegra X2 T186
(Average)
New price on eBay
- -
(Average)
Used price on eBay
- -


Price: prices can change over time. For technical reasons, they are not updated in real time. This is only an average of the results on the first page of each product, whether new or used. Shipping costs have not been integrated. To know the final price of the product, please go to the form of the shop. If no price is indicated, it means that we did not find any offers during the last update.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. The processor Nvidia Tegra X2 T186 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Pentium Gold 4417U is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Intel Pentium Gold 4417U was designed earlier.

Ratios: we first consider the average for the new price if available, the average for the used price otherwise. Performance / global cost ratio: This is the ratio of performance on Geekbench 4, divided by the cost of the product + the cost of electricity over 5 years for a duration of use of 13 hours per day.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Nvidia Tegra X2 T186 1,855
6,314
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U 3,100
5,997


In single core, the difference is 67%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 5%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.









GadgetVersus.com © 2020 - Privacy policy
Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland