Intel Core Ultra 5 125H vs Intel Core i5-13500H


Intel Core Ultra 5 125H on Amazon USA
Intel Core i5-13500H on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H on one side and the Intel Core i5-13500H on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, It has 14 cores, 18 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.5GHz. The second is used on the laptop segment, it has a total of 12 cores, 16 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4.7 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.






Specification comparison:


Processor Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Intel Core i5-13500H
Market (main)Laptop Laptop
ISAx86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
MicroarchitectureRedwood Cove + Crestmont Raptor Cove + Gracemont
Core nameMeteor Lake-H Raptor Lake-H
FamilyCore Ultra 5 Core i5-13000
Part number(s), S-Spec

QQ807230556E,
SRMZ4

FJ8071505203600,
SRMHY
Release dateQ4 2023 Q1 2023
LithographyIntel 4 Intel 7
Cores14 12
Threads18 16
Base frequency1.2 GHz 2.6 GHz
Turbo frequency4.5 GHz 4.7 GHz
Energy cores

8 Cores 8 Threads @ 0.7 / 3.6 GHz,
2 Cores 2 Threads @ 0.7 / 2.5 GHz

8 Cores 8 Threads @ 1.9 / 3.5 GHz
High performance cores

4 Cores 8 Threads @ 1.2 / 4.5 GHz

4 Cores 8 Threads @ 2.6 / 4.7 GHz
Cache memory18 MB 18 MB
Max memory capacity96 GB 64 GB
Memory types

LPDDR5/x 7467 MT/s, DDR5 5600 MT/s

DDR5 5200 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s,
LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s
Max # of memory channels2 2
Max PCIe lanes20 28
TDP28 W 45 W
GPU integrated graphicsIntel Arc Graphics (7-Cores) Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
GPU cores7 -
GPU execution units- 80
GPU shading units- 640
GPU base clock300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU boost clock2200 MHz 1450 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point- 1,664 GFLOPS
SocketBGA2049 BGA1744
Maximum temperature110°C 100°C
AI accelerator

Intel AI Boost @ 1.4 GHz

Gaussian & Neural Accelerator,
Deep Learning Boost
Crypto engine

AES New Instructions,
Secure Key

AES New Instructions,
Secure Key
Security

Control-Flow Enforcement Technology,
Total Memory Encryption,
Trusted Execution Technology,
OS Guard,
Boot Guard,
Mode-based Execute Control

OS Guard,
Boot Guard,
Trusted Execution Technology,
Execute Disable Bit,
Control-Flow Enforcement Technology
Max display resolution

4096x2304@60Hz (HDMI),
7680x4320@60Hz (HDMI),
7680x4320@60Hz (DP),
3840x2400@120Hz (eDP)

4096 x 2304@60Hz (HDMI),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
4096 x 2304@120Hz (eDP)
CPU-Z single thread664 721
CPU-Z multi thread4,862 6,417
Cinebench R15 single thread241 254
Cinebench R15 multi-thread1,712 2,246
Cinebench R20 single thread660 2,223
Cinebench R20 multi-thread3,894 5,604
Cinebench R23 single thread1,669 1,686
Cinebench R23 multi-thread10,044 14,377
PassMark single thread3,572 3,660
PassMark CPU Mark18,794 24,062
(Windows)
Geekbench 4 single core
6,916 7,779
(Windows)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
40,053 41,931
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 single core
1,643 1,703
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
10,813 10,901
(Windows)
Geekbench 6 single core
2,234 2,399
(Windows)
Geekbench 6 multi-core
11,336 11,365
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS Performance
657.6 GFLOPS 650 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
1,430 pts / W 932 pts / W
Amazon
eBay



We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Intel Core Ultra 5 125H has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i5-13500H is bigger, that the PDT of Intel Core Ultra 5 125H is lower. Both were produced in the same year.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.


CPU-Z - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score
Intel Core i5-13500H 721
6,417
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 664
4,862


In single core, the difference is 9%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 32%.


CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.




Cinebench R15 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score
Intel Core i5-13500H 254
2,246
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 241
1,712


In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 31%.


Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


Cinebench R20 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score
Intel Core i5-13500H 2,223
5,604
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 660
3,894


In single core, the difference is 237%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 44%.


Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.




Cinebench R23 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score
Intel Core i5-13500H 1,686
14,377
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 1,669
10,044


In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 43%.


Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.


PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i5-13500H 3,660
24,062
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 3,572
18,794


In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 28%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Windows:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows
Intel Core i5-13500H 7,779
41,931
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 6,916
40,053


In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 5%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


With Windows:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows
Intel Core i5-13500H 1,703
10,901
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 1,643
10,813


In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.




With Windows:

Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows
Intel Core i5-13500H 2,399
11,365
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 2,234
11,336


In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 0%.

With Linux:

Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Linux
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 2,266
11,473
Intel Core i5-13500H 2,147
10,998


In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 4%.

With Android:

Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Intel Core i5-13500H 1,886
8,806
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 1,716
7,280


In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 21%.


Geekbench 6 is a benchmarking platform that is capable of evaluating the performance of a device across multiple operating systems. The software evaluates processor power, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, browsing; GPU computing capabilities, with image editing, video editing, gaming skills, machine learning workloads.


Equivalence:

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H AMD EquivalentIntel Core i5-13500H AMD Equivalent

See also:

Intel Core Ultra 5 125HLIntel Core Ultra 5 125UIntel Core Ultra 5 125UL

Intel Core i5-13500Intel Core i5-13500EIntel Core i5-13500HXIntel Core i5-13500TIntel Core i5-13500TE




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.