GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


Intel Core i9-9900KS vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900X


Intel Core i9-9900KS on Amazon USA
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i9-9900KS on one side and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a maximum frequency of 5.0GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 12 cores, 24 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4.6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first broadcast, the maximum number of PCIe lines, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15, as well as an average price.

Specifications:


Processor Intel Core i9-9900KS AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Market Desktop Desktop
Family Coffee Lake Zen 2
Part number(s), S-Spec BX80684I99900KS,
BXC80684I9990KS,
CM8068404170208,
SRG1Q
100-000000023,
100-100000023BOX
Release date Q4 2019 Q3 2019
Lithography 14 nm++ 7 nm FinFET
Transistors - 19,200,000,000
Cores 8 12
Threads 16 24
Base frequency 4.0 GHz 3.8 GHz
Turbo frequency 5.0 GHz 4.6 GHz
Cache memory 16 MB 64 MB
Max memory capacity 128 GB 128 GB
Memory types DDR4-2666 DDR4-3200
Max PCIe lanes 16 20
TDP 127 W 105 W
GPU integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 None
GPU execution units 23 -
GPU shading units 184 -
GPU clock rate 1,150 MHz -
GPU FP32 floating point 423.2 GFLOPS -
Socket LGA 1151 AM4
Cinebench R15 single thread 220 205
Cinebench R15 multi-thread 2,150 3,160
Cinebench R20 single thread 520 520
Cinebench R20 multi-thread 5,210 9,170
PassMark single thread 3,110 2,730
PassMark CPU Mark 19,960 32,890
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
6,728 5,855
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
36,852 47,507
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 single core
1,408 1,220
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
9,748 11,644
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
722 GFLOPS 820 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / price performance)
Performance / price ratio
53 pts / $ 97 pts / $
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
290 pts / W 452 pts / W
(Multi-core / global cost performance)
Performance / global cost ratio
35 pts / $ 60 pts / $
Note 4.8 / 5 4.8 / 5
Reviews 1,704 1,788
Amazon Intel Core i9-9900KS AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
(Average)
New price on Amazon
$700 $490
(Average)
Used price on Amazon
- $520
eBay Intel Core i9-9900KS AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
(Average)
New price on eBay
$860 $650
(Average)
Used price on eBay
$1,450 $460


Price: prices can change over time. For technical reasons, they are not updated in real time. This is only an average of the results on the first page of each product, whether new or used. Shipping costs have not been integrated. To know the final price of the product, please go to the form of the shop. If no price is indicated, it means that we did not find any offers during the last update.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. The processor AMD Ryzen 9 3900X has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i9-9900KS is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X is less. Both were produced in the same year.

Ratios: we first consider the average for the new price if available, the average for the used price otherwise. Performance / global cost ratio: This is the ratio of performance on Geekbench 4, divided by the cost of the product + the cost of electricity over 5 years for a duration of use of 13 hours per day.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 205
3,160
Intel Core i9-9900KS 220
2,150


In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 47%.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


Cinebench R20 - Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 520
9,170
Intel Core i9-9900KS 520
5,210


In a single core, there is no noticeable difference. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 76%.

Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.


PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 2,730
32,890
Intel Core i9-9900KS 3,110
19,960


In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 65%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.


On Windows 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 5,855
47,507
Intel Core i9-9900KS 6,728
36,852


In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 29%.

On Linux 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 6,050
49,198
Intel Core i9-9900KS 7,208
43,258


In single core, the difference is 19%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 14%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Mac OS X 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 5,845
52,127
Intel Core i9-9900KS 6,522
38,820


In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 34%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


On Windows:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 1,220
11,644
Intel Core i9-9900KS 1,408
9,748


In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 19%.

On Linux:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 1,354
12,335
Intel Core i9-9900KS 1,487
9,819


In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 26%.

On macOS:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - macOS
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 1,235
10,988
Intel Core i9-9900KS 1,288
8,888


In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 24%.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.






Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland