Intel Core i9-11900K vs Dual AMD EPYC 7702
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i9-11900K on one side and the Dual AMD EPYC 7702 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a maximum frequency of 5.3GHz. The second is used on the server segment, it has a total of 64 cores, 128 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | |
Intel Core i9-11900K |
| | |
Dual AMD EPYC 7702 |
| |
Market | |
Desktop |
| | |
Server |
| |
Family | |
Rocket Lake |
| | |
Zen 2 |
| |
Part number(s), S-Spec | |
Core i9-11900K |
| | |
100-000000038,
100-100000038WOF |
| |
Release date | |
Q1 2021 |
| | |
Q3 2019 |
| |
Lithography | |
14 nm+++ |
| | |
7 nm |
| |
Transistors | |
- |
| | |
64,000,000,000 |
| |
Cores | |
8 |
| | |
128 |
| |
Threads | |
16 |
| | |
256 |
| |
Base frequency | |
3.4 GHz |
| | |
2.0 GHz |
| |
Turbo frequency | |
5.3 GHz |
| | |
3.4 GHz |
| |
Cache memory | |
16 MB |
| | |
512 MB |
| |
Max memory capacity | |
128 GB |
| | |
8 TB |
| |
Memory types | |
DDR4-3200 |
| | |
DDR4-3200 |
| |
Max # of memory channels | |
2 |
| | |
16 |
| |
Max memory bandwidth | |
45.8 GB/s |
| | |
381.4 GB/s |
| |
Max PCIe lanes | |
20 |
| | |
256 |
| |
TDP | |
125 W |
| | |
400 W |
| |
GPU integrated graphics | |
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Rocket Lake) |
| | |
None |
| |
GPU execution units | |
24 |
| | |
- |
| |
GPU shading units | |
192 |
| | |
- |
| |
GPU base clock rate | |
350 MHz |
| | |
- |
| |
GPU max clock rate | |
1200 MHz |
| | |
- |
| |
Socket | |
LGA1200 |
| | |
SP3, LGA-4094 |
| |
CPU-Z single thread | |
708 |
| | |
397 |
| |
CPU-Z multi thread | |
6,443 |
| | |
39,875 |
| |
Amazon | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
eBay | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. The processor Dual AMD EPYC 7702 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i9-11900K is greater, that the PDT of Intel Core i9-11900K is lower. The Intel Core i9-11900K was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
In single core, the difference is 78%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 519%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i9-11900K AMD equivalentDual AMD EPYC 7702 Intel equivalentSee also:
Intel Core i9-11900Intel Core i9-11900TAMD EPYC 7702AMD EPYC 7702P
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.