Intel Core i9-11900K vs Dual AMD EPYC 7282
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i9-11900K on one side and the Dual AMD EPYC 7282 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a maximum frequency of 5.3GHz. The second is used on the server segment, it has a total of 16 cores, 32 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.2 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | |
Intel Core i9-11900K |
| | |
Dual AMD EPYC 7282 |
| |
Market | |
Desktop |
| | |
Server |
| |
Family | |
Rocket Lake |
| | |
Zen 2 |
| |
Part number(s), S-Spec | |
Core i9-11900K |
| | |
100-000000078,
100-100000078WOF |
| |
Release date | |
Q1 2021 |
| | |
Q3 2019 |
| |
Lithography | |
14 nm+++ |
| | |
7 nm |
| |
Cores | |
8 |
| | |
32 |
| |
Threads | |
16 |
| | |
64 |
| |
Base frequency | |
3.4 GHz |
| | |
2.8 GHz |
| |
Turbo frequency | |
5.3 GHz |
| | |
3.2 GHz |
| |
Cache memory | |
16 MB |
| | |
128 MB |
| |
Max memory capacity | |
128 GB |
| | |
8 TB |
| |
Memory types | |
DDR4-3200 |
| | |
DDR4-3200 |
| |
Max # of memory channels | |
2 |
| | |
16 |
| |
Max memory bandwidth | |
45.8 GB/s |
| | |
381.4 GB/s |
| |
Max PCIe lanes | |
20 |
| | |
256 |
| |
TDP | |
125 W |
| | |
240 W |
| |
GPU integrated graphics | |
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Rocket Lake) |
| | |
None |
| |
GPU execution units | |
24 |
| | |
- |
| |
GPU shading units | |
192 |
| | |
- |
| |
GPU base clock rate | |
350 MHz |
| | |
- |
| |
GPU max clock rate | |
1200 MHz |
| | |
- |
| |
Socket | |
LGA1200 |
| | |
SP3, LGA-4094 |
| |
(Windows | Linux) Geekbench 5 single core | |
1,808 |
| | |
997 |
| |
(Windows | Linux) Geekbench 5 multi-core | |
9,914 |
| | |
17,864 |
| |
Amazon | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
eBay | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. The processor Dual AMD EPYC 7282 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i9-11900K is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Dual AMD EPYC 7282 is less. The Intel Core i9-11900K was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
On Windows:
In single core, the difference is 104%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 26%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i9-11900K AMD equivalentDual AMD EPYC 7282 Intel equivalentSee also:
Intel Core i9-11900Intel Core i9-11900TAMD EPYC 7282
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.