GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


Intel Core i7-9700 vs Dual AMD EPYC 7702


Intel Core i7-9700 on Amazon USA
Dual AMD EPYC 7702 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i7-9700 on one side and the Dual AMD EPYC 7702 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.7GHz. The second is used on the server segment, it has a total of 64 cores, 128 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first broadcast, the maximum number of PCIe lines, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15, as well as an average price.

Specifications:


Processor Intel Core i7-9700 Dual AMD EPYC 7702
Market Desktop Server
Family Coffee Lake Zen 2
Part number(s), S-Spec CM8068403874521,
SRG13
100-000000038,
100-100000038WOF
Release date Q2 2019 Q3 2019
Lithography 14 nm++ 7 nm
Transistors - 64,000,000,000
Cores 8 128
Threads 8 256
Base frequency 3.0 GHz 2.0 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.7 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cache memory 12 MB 512 MB
Max memory capacity 128 GB 8 TB
Memory types DDR4-2666 DDR4-3200
Max PCIe lanes 16 256
TDP 65 W 400 W
GPU integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 None
GPU execution units 23 -
GPU shading units 184 -
GPU clock rate 1,150 MHz -
GPU FP32 floating point 423.2 GFLOPS -
Socket LGA 1151 SP3, LGA-4094
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
6,278 4,775
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
31,114 159,573
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
419.5 GFLOPS 1,550 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / price performance)
Performance / price ratio
80 pts / $ 16 pts / $
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
479 pts / W 399 pts / W
(Multi-core / global cost performance)
Performance / global cost ratio
54 pts / $ 14 pts / $
Note 4.6 / 5 -
Reviews 171 -
Amazon Intel Core i7-9700 Dual AMD EPYC 7702
(Average)
New price on Amazon
$390 -
(Average)
Used price on Amazon
- -
eBay Intel Core i7-9700 Dual AMD EPYC 7702
(Average)
New price on eBay
$460 -
(Average)
Used price on eBay
$310 -


Price: prices can change over time. For technical reasons, they are not updated in real time. This is only an average of the results on the first page of each product, whether new or used. Shipping costs have not been integrated. To know the final price of the product, please go to the form of the shop. If no price is indicated, it means that we did not find any offers during the last update.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. The processor Dual AMD EPYC 7702 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i7-9700 is greater, that the PDT of Intel Core i7-9700 is lower. Both were produced in the same year.

Ratios: we first consider the average for the new price if available, the average for the used price otherwise. Performance / global cost ratio: This is the ratio of performance on Geekbench 4, divided by the cost of the product + the cost of electricity over 5 years for a duration of use of 13 hours per day.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


On Windows 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
Dual AMD EPYC 7702 3,895
29,032
Intel Core i7-9700 5,528
26,583


In single core, the difference is 42%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 9%.

On Linux 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-bit
Dual AMD EPYC 7702 4,775
159,573
Intel Core i7-9700 6,278
31,114


In single core, the difference is 31%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 413%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.






Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland