Intel Core i7-8750H vs Intel Core m3-8100Y
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i7-8750H on one side and the Intel Core m3-8100Y on the other side. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.1GHz. The second is used on the laptop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | |
Intel Core i7-8750H |
| | |
Intel Core m3-8100Y |
| |
Market | |
Laptop |
| | |
Laptop |
| |
Family | |
Coffee Lake |
| | |
Amber Lake Y |
| |
Part number(s), S-Spec | |
CL8068403359524,
SR3YY |
| | |
HE8067702739859,
SRD23 |
| |
Release date | |
Q2 2018 |
| | |
Q3 2018 |
| |
Lithography | |
14 nm++ |
| | |
14 nm++ |
| |
Cores | |
6 |
| | |
2 |
| |
Threads | |
12 |
| | |
4 |
| |
Base frequency | |
2.2 GHz |
| | |
1.1 GHz |
| |
Turbo frequency | |
4.1 GHz |
| | |
3.4 GHz |
| |
Bus speed | |
8 GT/s |
| | |
4 GT/s |
| |
Cache memory | |
9 MB |
| | |
4 MB |
| |
Max memory capacity | |
64 GB |
| | |
16 GB |
| |
Memory types | |
DDR4-2666,
LPDDR3-2133 |
| | |
LPDDR3-1866,
DDR3L-1600 |
| |
Max # of memory channels | |
2 |
| | |
2 |
| |
Max memory bandwidth | |
41.8 GB/s |
| | |
33.3 GB/s |
| |
Max PCIe lanes | |
16 |
| | |
10 |
| |
TDP | |
45 W |
| | |
5 W |
| |
GPU integrated graphics | |
Intel UHD Graphics 630 Mobile (Coffee Lake) |
| | |
Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
| |
GPU execution units | |
24 |
| | |
24 |
| |
GPU shading units | |
192 |
| | |
192 |
| |
GPU base clock rate | |
350 MHz |
| | |
300 MHz |
| |
GPU max clock rate | |
1100 MHz |
| | |
900 MHz |
| |
GPU FP32 floating point | |
384 GFLOPS |
| | |
403.2 GFLOPS |
| |
Socket | |
BGA1440 |
| | |
BGA1515 |
| |
CPU-Z single thread | |
452 |
| | |
292 |
| |
CPU-Z multi thread | |
3,363 |
| | |
781 |
| |
Cinebench R15 single thread | |
174 |
| | |
107 |
| |
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | |
1,158 |
| | |
214 |
| |
PassMark single thread | |
2,350 |
| | |
1,900 |
| |
PassMark CPU Mark | |
10,320 |
| | |
2,900 |
| |
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | |
4,428 |
| | |
3,654 |
| |
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | |
17,560 |
| | |
6,347 |
| |
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | |
301.8 GFLOPS |
| | |
111.9 GFLOPS |
| |
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | |
390 pts / W |
| | |
1,269 pts / W |
| |
Amazon | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
eBay | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. The processor Intel Core i7-8750H has more cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i7-8750H is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core m3-8100Y is less. Both were produced in the same year.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
In single core, the difference is 55%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 331%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
In single core, the difference is 63%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 441%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 256%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 21%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 177%.
On Linux 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 18%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 162%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 33%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 252%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i7-8750H AMD equivalentIntel Core m3-8100Y AMD equivalent