Intel Core i7-8750H vs Intel Core m3-8100Y
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i7-8750H on one side and the Intel Core m3-8100Y on the other side. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.1GHz. The second is used on the laptop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first broadcast, the maximum number of PCIe lines, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15, as well as an average price.
Specifications:
| Processor | |
Intel Core i7-8750H |
| | |
Intel Core m3-8100Y |
| |
| Market | |
Laptop |
| | |
Laptop |
| |
| Family | |
Coffee Lake |
| | |
Amber Lake Y |
| |
| Part number(s), S-Spec | |
CL8068403359524,
SR3YY |
| | |
HE8067702739859,
SRD23 |
| |
| Release date | |
Q2 2018 |
| | |
Q3 2018 |
| |
| Lithography | |
14 nm++ |
| | |
14 nm++ |
| |
| Cores | |
6 |
| | |
2 |
| |
| Threads | |
12 |
| | |
4 |
| |
| Base frequency | |
2.2 GHz |
| | |
1.1 GHz |
| |
| Turbo frequency | |
4.1 GHz |
| | |
3.4 GHz |
| |
| Bus speed | |
8 GT/s |
| | |
4 GT/s |
| |
| Cache memory | |
9 MB |
| | |
4 MB |
| |
| Max memory capacity | |
64 GB |
| | |
16 GB |
| |
| Memory types | |
DDR4-2666,
LPDDR3-2133 |
| | |
LPDDR3-1866,
DDR3L-1600 |
| |
| Max # of memory channels | |
2 |
| | |
2 |
| |
| Max memory bandwidth | |
41.8 GB/s |
| | |
33.3 GB/s |
| |
| Max PCIe lanes | |
16 |
| | |
10 |
| |
| TDP | |
45 W |
| | |
5 W |
| |
| GPU integrated graphics | |
Intel UHD Graphics 630 Mobile (Coffee Lake) |
| | |
Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
| |
| GPU execution units | |
24 |
| | |
24 |
| |
| GPU shading units | |
192 |
| | |
192 |
| |
| GPU base clock rate | |
350 MHz |
| | |
300 MHz |
| |
| GPU max clock rate | |
1100 MHz |
| | |
900 MHz |
| |
| GPU FP32 floating point | |
384 GFLOPS |
| | |
403.2 GFLOPS |
| |
| Socket | |
BGA1440 |
| | |
BGA1515 |
| |
| Cinebench R15 single thread | |
174 |
| | |
107 |
| |
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | |
1,158 |
| | |
214 |
| |
| PassMark single thread | |
2,350 |
| | |
1,900 |
| |
| PassMark CPU Mark | |
10,320 |
| | |
2,900 |
| |
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core | |
4,428 |
| | |
3,654 |
| |
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core | |
17,560 |
| | |
6,347 |
| |
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance | |
301.8 GFLOPS |
| | |
111.9 GFLOPS |
| |
(Multi-core / price performance)
Performance / price ratio | |
11 pts / $ |
| | |
13 pts / $ |
| |
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio | |
390 pts / W |
| | |
1,269 pts / W |
| |
(Multi-core / global cost performance)
Performance / global cost ratio | |
11 pts / $ |
| | |
13 pts / $ |
| |
| Note | |
3.9 / 5 |
| | |
3.8 / 5 |
| |
| Reviews | |
1,254 |
| | |
193 |
| |
| Amazon | |
Intel Core i7-8750H |
| | |
Intel Core m3-8100Y |
| |
(Average)
New price on Amazon | |
- |
| | |
$490 |
| |
(Average)
Used price on Amazon | |
- |
| | |
$340 |
| |
| eBay | |
Intel Core i7-8750H |
| | |
Intel Core m3-8100Y |
| |
(Average)
New price on eBay | |
$1,540 |
| | |
$730 |
| |
(Average)
Used price on eBay | |
$1,120 |
| | |
- |
| |
Price: prices can change over time. For technical reasons, they are not updated in real time. This is only an average of the results on the first page of each product, whether new or used. Shipping costs have not been integrated. To know the final price of the product, please go to the form of the shop. If no price is indicated, it means that we did not find any offers during the last update.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. The processor Intel Core i7-8750H has more cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i7-8750H is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core m3-8100Y is less. Both were produced in the same year.
Ratios: we first consider the average for the new price if available, the average for the used price otherwise. Performance / global cost ratio: This is the ratio of performance on Geekbench 4, divided by the cost of the product + the cost of electricity over 5 years for a duration of use of 13 hours per day.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
In single core, the difference is 63%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 441%.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 256%.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 21%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 177%.
On Linux 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 18%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 162%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 33%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 252%.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
FR