GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


Intel Core i7-3630QM vs Dual AMD EPYC 7742


Intel Core i7-3630QM on Amazon USA
Dual AMD EPYC 7742 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i7-3630QM on one side and the Dual AMD EPYC 7742 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.4GHz. The second is used on the server segment, it has a total of 64 cores, 128 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first broadcast, the maximum number of PCIe lines, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.






Specifications:


Processor Intel Core i7-3630QM Dual AMD EPYC 7742
Market Laptop Server
Family Haswell Zen 2
Part number(s), S-Spec AW8063801106200,
QCF5, SR0UX
100-000000053,
100-100000053WOF
Release date Q3 2012 Q3 2019
Lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Transistors 1,400,000,000 79,080,000,000
Cores 4 128
Threads 8 256
Base frequency 2.4 GHz 2.3 GHz
Turbo frequency 3.4 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cache memory 6 MB 512 MB
Max memory capacity 32 GB 8 TB
Memory types DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 DDR4-3200
Max # of memory channels 2 16
Max memory bandwidth 25.6 GB/s 381.4 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes 16 256
TDP 45 W 450 W
GPU integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 4000 Mobile None
GPU execution units 16 -
GPU shading units 128 -
GPU base clock rate 650 MHz -
GPU max clock rate 1150 MHz -
GPU FP32 floating point 256 GFLOPS -
Socket PGA988 SP3, LGA-4094
Cinebench R15 single thread 98 145
Cinebench R15 multi-thread 470 11,332
PassMark single thread 1,710 2,310
PassMark CPU Mark 5,200 55,580
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
3,448 4,731
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
10,374 186,120
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
114.6 GFLOPS 2,513 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
231 pts / W 414 pts / W
Amazon
eBay




We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. The processor Dual AMD EPYC 7742 has a larger number of cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that the PDT of Intel Core i7-3630QM is lower. The Dual AMD EPYC 7742 was started more recently.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score
Dual AMD EPYC 7742#ad 145
11,332
Intel Core i7-3630QM#ad 98
470


In single core, the difference is 48%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 2311%.


Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
Dual AMD EPYC 7742#ad 2,310
55,580
Intel Core i7-3630QM#ad 1,710
5,200


In single core, the difference is 35%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 969%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.


On Windows 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
Dual AMD EPYC 7742#ad 4,337
41,576
Intel Core i7-3630QM#ad 3,144
10,266


In single core, the difference is 38%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 305%.

On Linux 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-bit
Dual AMD EPYC 7742#ad 4,731
186,120
Intel Core i7-3630QM#ad 3,448
10,374


In single core, the difference is 37%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1694%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


Equivalence:

Intel Core i7-3630QM AMD equivalentDual AMD EPYC 7742 Intel equivalent

See also:

AMD EPYC 7742








GadgetVersus.com © 2020 - Privacy policy - Advertising policy

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland