Intel Core i7-11700F vs AMD A9-9425

Intel Core i7-11700F on Amazon USA
AMD A9-9425 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i7-11700F on one side and the AMD A9-9425 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.9GHz. The second is used on the notebook segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 2 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.7 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.


Processor Intel Core i7-11700F AMD A9-9425
Market (main) Desktop Notebook
ISA x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture Rocket Lake Excavator
Core name Rocket Lake-S Stoney Ridge
Family Core i7-11000 A9-9000
Part number(s), S-Spec CM8070804491213,
Release date Q1 2021 Q1 2016
Lithography 14 nm+++ 28 nm
Transistors - 1,200,000,000
Cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Base frequency 2.5 GHz 3.1 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.9 GHz 3.7 GHz
Cache memory 16 MB 1 MB
Max memory capacity 128 GB 8 GB
Memory types DDR4-3200 DDR4-2133
Max # of memory channels 2 1
Max PCIe lanes 20 8
TDP 65 W 15 W
Suggested PSU 600W ATX Power Supply -
GPU integrated graphics None AMD Radeon R5 Graphics (Stoney)
GPU shading units - 192
GPU base clock rate - 200 MHz
GPU max clock rate - 800 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point - 325.2 GFLOPS
Socket LGA1200 BGA
Compatible motherboard Socket LGA 1200 Motherboard  -
Maximum temperature 100°C 90°C
CPU-Z single thread 641 196
CPU-Z multi thread 6,051 351
PassMark single thread 3,389 1,380
PassMark CPU Mark 21,014 1,550
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
7,353 3,628
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
38,480 7,137
Geekbench 5 single core
1,551 419
Geekbench 5 multi-core
7,645 666
GFLOPS performance
734.7 GFLOPS 88.06 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
592 pts / W 476 pts / W

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Intel Core i7-11700F has more cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i7-11700F is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of AMD A9-9425 is less. The Intel Core i7-11700F was designed earlier.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

CPU-Z - Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-11700F 641
AMD A9-9425 196

In single core, the difference is 227%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1624%.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i7-11700F 3,389
AMD A9-9425 1,380

In single core, the difference is 146%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1256%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
Intel Core i7-11700F 7,353
AMD A9-9425 3,628

In single core, the difference is 103%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 439%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows
Intel Core i7-11700F 1,551
AMD A9-9425 419

In single core, the difference is 270%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1048%.

On Linux:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux
Intel Core i7-11700F 1,712
AMD A9-9425 396

In single core, the difference is 332%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1773%.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.


Intel Core i7-11700F AMD equivalentAMD A9-9425 Intel equivalent

See also:

Intel Core i7-11700Intel Core i7-11700KIntel Core i7-11700KFIntel Core i7-11700T

AMD A9-9420e © 2021 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland