Intel Core i5-4200M vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600


Intel Core i5-4200M on Amazon USA
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-4200M on one side and the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, It has 2 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.1GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.






Specifications:


Processor Intel Core i5-4200M AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Market (main) Laptop Desktop
ISA x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture Haswell Zen
Core name Haswell-MB Summit Ridge
Family Core i5-4000 Ryzen 5 1000
Part number(s), S-Spec CW8064701486606,
SR1HA
YD1600BBAEBOX,
YD1600BBM6IAE
Release date Q4 2013 Q1 2017
Lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Transistors 960,000,000 4,800,000,000
Cores 2 6
Threads 4 12
Base frequency 2.5 GHz 3.2 GHz
Turbo frequency 3.1 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cache memory 3 MB 16 MB
Max memory capacity 32 GB 64 GB
Memory types DDR3L 1333/1600 DDR4-2667
Max # of memory channels 2 2
Max memory bandwidth 25.6 GB/s 39.74 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes 16 20
TDP 37 W 65 W
Suggested PSU - 600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 4600 Mobile None
GPU execution units 20 -
GPU shading units 160 -
GPU base clock 400 MHz -
GPU boost clock 1150 MHz -
GPU FP32 floating point 352 GFLOPS -
Socket PGA946 AM4, PGA-1331
Compatible motherboard - Socket AM4 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature 100°C 95°C
CPU-Z single thread 307 403
CPU-Z multi thread 814 3,157
Cinebench R15 single thread 116 145
Cinebench R15 multi-thread 285 1,147
Cinebench R20 single thread 232 350
Cinebench R20 multi-thread 638 2,580
Cinebench R23 single thread 602 824
Cinebench R23 multi-thread 1,453 6,476
PassMark single thread 1,639 2,110
PassMark CPU Mark 2,787 12,550
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
3,947 4,114
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
5,572 19,013
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
94.7 GFLOPS 247.7 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
151 pts / W 293 pts / W
Amazon
eBay



We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is bigger, that the PDT of Intel Core i5-4200M is lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 was started more recently.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


CPU-Z - Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 403
3,157
Intel Core i5-4200M 307
814


In single core, the difference is 31%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 288%.


CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.


Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 145
1,147
Intel Core i5-4200M 116
285


In single core, the difference is 25%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 302%.


Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


Cinebench R20 - Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 350
2,580
Intel Core i5-4200M 232
638


In single core, the difference is 51%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 304%.


Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.


Cinebench R23 - Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 824
6,476
Intel Core i5-4200M 602
1,453


In single core, the difference is 37%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 346%.


Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.


PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 2,110
12,550
Intel Core i5-4200M 1,639
2,787


In single core, the difference is 29%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 350%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.





On Windows 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 4,114
19,013
Intel Core i5-4200M 3,947
5,572


In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 241%.

On Linux 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 4,354
19,596
Intel Core i5-4200M 2,953
5,168


In single core, the difference is 47%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 279%.

On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3,435
9,900
Intel Core i5-4200M 3,760
7,206


In single core, the difference is 9%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 37%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Mac OS X 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 4,216
19,258
Intel Core i5-4200M 3,289
6,216


In single core, the difference is 28%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 210%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


Equivalence:

Intel Core i5-4200M AMD equivalentAMD Ryzen 5 1600 Intel equivalent

See also:

Intel Core i5-4200U

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AFAMD Ryzen 5 1600X




GadgetVersus.com © 2021 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland