GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


Intel Core i5-3450 vs Nvidia Tegra X1 T210


Intel Core i5-3450 on Amazon USA
Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-3450 on one side and the Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.5GHz. The second is used on the console segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the date of first broadcast, the maximum number of PCIe lines, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15, as well as an average price.

Specifications:


Processor Intel Core i5-3450 Nvidia Tegra X1 T210
Market Desktop Console
Family Ivy Bridge Tegra
Part number(s), S-Spec BX80637I53450,
BXC80637I53450,
CM8063701159406,
CM8063701159407,
QC16, QC3Z, SR0PF
Tegra X1 T210, Erista
Release date Q2 2012 Q2 2015
Lithography 22 nm 20 nm
Transistors 1,400,000,000 -
Cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Base frequency 3.1 GHz 1.3 GHz
Turbo frequency 3.5 GHz 1.9 GHz
Energy cores - 4x ARM Cortex-A72 @ 1.5 GHz
High performance cores - 4x ARM Cortex-A57 @ 1.9 GHz
Cache memory 6 MB 2.5 MB
Max memory capacity 32 GB 8 GB
Memory types DDR3 1333/1600 LPDDR3, LPDDR4
TDP 77 W 15 W
GPU integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 2500 NVIDIA Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU
GPU execution units 6 1
GPU shading units 48 256
GPU clock rate 1,150 MHz 1,000 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 110.4 GFLOPS 512 GFLOPS
(Linux 64-bit | Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
3,279 1,158
(Linux 64-bit | Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
7,281 3,276
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
142.1 GFLOPS 33.6 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / price performance)
Performance / price ratio
182 pts / $ 15 pts / $
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
95 pts / W 218 pts / W
(Multi-core / global cost performance)
Performance / global cost ratio
28 pts / $ 12 pts / $
Note 4.7 / 5 4.5 / 5
Reviews 38 11,686
Amazon Intel Core i5-3450 Nvidia Tegra X1 T210
(Average)
New price on Amazon
- -
(Average)
Used price on Amazon
- -
eBay Intel Core i5-3450 Nvidia Tegra X1 T210
(Average)
New price on eBay
- -
(Average)
Used price on eBay
- -


Price: prices can change over time. For technical reasons, they are not updated in real time. This is only an average of the results on the first page of each product, whether new or used. Shipping costs have not been integrated. To know the final price of the product, please go to the form of the shop. If no price is indicated, it means that we did not find any offers during the last update.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. The processor Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i5-3450 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 is less. The Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 was started more recently.

Ratios: we first consider the average for the new price if available, the average for the used price otherwise. Performance / global cost ratio: This is the ratio of performance on Geekbench 4, divided by the cost of the product + the cost of electricity over 5 years for a duration of use of 13 hours per day.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Intel Core i5-3450 3,259
9,370
Nvidia Tegra X1 T210 1,158
3,276


In single core, the difference is 181%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 186%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.






Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland