Intel Core i5-12450H vs Intel Core i5-12500H
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-12450H on one side and the Intel Core i5-12500H on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, It has 8 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.4GHz. The second is used on the laptop segment, it has a total of 12 cores, 16 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4.5 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Processor |
| Intel Core i5-12450H | | |
| Intel Core i5-12500H | | |
Market (main) | | Laptop |
| | | Laptop | | |
ISA | | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| | | x86-64 (64 bit) | | |
Microarchitecture | | Golden Cove + Gracemont |
| | | Golden Cove + Gracemont | | |
Core name | | Alder Lake-H |
| | | Alder Lake-H | | |
Family | | Core i5-12000 |
| | | Core i5-12000 | | |
Part number(s), S-Spec | |
FJ8071504785706,
SRLCX
| | | |
FJ8071504785804,
SRLCY
| | |
Release date | | Q1 2022 |
| | | Q1 2022 | | |
Lithography | | Intel 7 |
| | | Intel 7 | | |
Cores | | 8 |
| | | 12 | | |
Threads | | 12 |
| | | 16 | | |
Base frequency | | 2.0 GHz |
| | | 2.5 GHz | | |
Turbo frequency | | 4.4 GHz |
| | | 4.5 GHz | | |
Energy cores | | 4 Cores 4 Threads @ 1.8 / 3.1 GHz
|
| | | 8 Cores 8 Threads @ 1.8 / 3.3 GHz
| | |
High performance cores | | 4 Cores 8 Threads @ 2.0 / 4.4 GHz
|
| | | 4 Cores 8 Threads @ 2.5 / 4.5 GHz
| | |
Cache memory | | 12 MB |
| | | 18 MB | | |
Max memory capacity | | 64 GB |
| | | 64 GB | | |
Memory types | | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200,
LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267
|
| | | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200,
LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267
| | |
Max # of memory channels | | 2 |
| | | 2 | | |
Max PCIe lanes | | 28 |
| | | 28 | | |
TDP | | 45 W |
| | | 45 W | | |
GPU integrated graphics | | Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 48EU) |
| | | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) | | |
GPU execution units | | 48 |
| | | 80 | | |
GPU shading units | | 384 |
| | | 640 | | |
GPU base clock | | 300 MHz |
| | | 300 MHz | | |
GPU boost clock | | 1200 MHz |
| | | 1300 MHz | | |
GPU FP32 floating point | | 883.2 GFLOPS |
| | | 1,664 GFLOPS | | |
Socket | | BGA1744 |
| | | BGA1744 | | |
Maximum temperature | | 100°C |
| | | 100°C | | |
AI accelerator | | Gaussian & Neural Accelerator,
Deep Learning Boost
|
| | | Gaussian & Neural Accelerator,
Deep Learning Boost
| | |
Crypto engine | | AES New Instructions,
Secure Key
|
| | | AES New Instructions,
Secure Key
| | |
Security | | OS Guard,
Boot Guard,
Mode-based Execute Control,
Control-Flow Enforcement Technology
|
| | | OS Guard,
Boot Guard,
Mode-based Execute Control,
Control-Flow Enforcement Technology
| | |
Max display resolution | | 4096 x 2304@60Hz (HDMI),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
4096 x 2304@120Hz (eDP)
|
| | | 4096 x 2304@60Hz (HDMI),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
4096 x 2304@120Hz (eDP)
| | |
CPU-Z single thread | | 682 |
| | | 701 | | |
CPU-Z multi thread | | 4,637 |
| | | 4,763 | | |
Cinebench R15 single thread | | 228 |
| | | 246 | | |
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | | 1,324 |
| | | 2,082 | | |
Cinebench R20 single thread | | 561 |
| | | 669 | | |
Cinebench R20 multi-thread | | 3,302 |
| | | 5,628 | | |
Cinebench R23 single thread | | 1,517 |
| | | 1,718 | | |
Cinebench R23 multi-thread | | 9,244 |
| | | 14,757 | | |
PassMark single thread | | 3,617 |
| | | 3,566 | | |
PassMark CPU Mark | | 19,811 |
| | | 21,832 | | |
(Windows) Geekbench 4 single core | | 7,171 |
| | | 7,359 | | |
(Windows) Geekbench 4 multi-core | | 32,373 |
| | | 37,980 | | |
(Windows) Geekbench 5 single core | | 1,629 |
| | | 1,657 | | |
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core | | 8,833 |
| | | 8,971 | | |
(Windows) Geekbench 6 single core | | 2,168 |
| | | 2,059 | | |
(Windows) Geekbench 6 multi-core | | 9,297 |
| | | 10,514 | | |
(SGEMM) GFLOPS Performance | | 476.6 GFLOPS |
| | | 563.8 GFLOPS | | |
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | | 719 pts / W |
| | | 844 pts / W | | |
Amazon | |  |
| | |  |
| |
eBay | |  |
| | |  |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Intel Core i5-12500H has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i5-12500H is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. Both were produced in the same year.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 3%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
In single core, the difference is 8%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 57%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
In single core, the difference is 19%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 70%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 60%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 10%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
With Windows:In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 17%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
With Windows:In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 2%.
With Linux:In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 4%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
With Windows:In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 13%.
With Linux:In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 19%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 6 is a benchmarking platform that is capable of evaluating the performance of a device across multiple operating systems. The software evaluates processor power, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, browsing; GPU computing capabilities, with image editing, video editing, gaming skills, machine learning workloads.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i5-12450H AMD EquivalentIntel Core i5-12500H AMD EquivalentSee also:
Intel Core i5-12450HXIntel Core i5-12500Intel Core i5-12500EIntel Core i5-12500T