Intel Core i5-12400 vs Intel Core i5-12400F


Intel Core i5-12400 on Amazon USA
Intel Core i5-12400F on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-12400 on one side and the Intel Core i5-12400F on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.4GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4.4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.






Specification comparison:


Processor Intel Core i5-12400 Intel Core i5-12400F
Market (main)Desktop Desktop
ISAx86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
MicroarchitectureGolden Cove + Gracemont Golden Cove + Gracemont
Core nameAlder Lake Alder Lake
FamilyCore i5-12000 Core i5-12000
Part number(s), S-Spec

CM8071504555317,
CM8071504650608,
BX8071512400,
SRL4V, SRL5Y

CM8071504555318,
CM8071504650609,
BX8071512400F,
SRL4W, SRL5Z
Release dateQ1 2022 Q1 2022
LithographyIntel 7 Intel 7
Cores6 6
Threads12 12
Base frequency2.5 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo frequency4.4 GHz 4.4 GHz
High performance cores

6 Cores 12 Threads @ 2.5 / 4.4 GHz

6 Cores 12 Threads @ 2.5 / 4.4 GHz
Cache memory18 MB 18 MB
Max memory capacity128 GB 128 GB
Memory types

DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s

DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
Max # of memory channels2 2
Max memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s 76.8 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes20 20
TDP65 W 65 W
Suggested PSU600W ATX Power Supply 600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphicsIntel UHD Graphics 730 (Alder Lake) None
GPU execution units24 -
GPU shading units192 -
GPU base clock300 MHz -
GPU boost clock1450 MHz -
GPU FP32 floating point537.6 GFLOPS -
SocketLGA1700 LGA1700
Compatible motherboardSocket LGA 1700 Motherboard  Socket LGA 1700 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature100°C 100°C
AI accelerator

Gaussian & Neural Accelerator

Gaussian & Neural Accelerator
Crypto engine

AES New Instructions,
Secure Key

AES New Instructions,
Secure Key
Security

OS Guard,
Execute Disable Bit,
Boot Guard,
Mode-based Execute Control,
Control-Flow Enforcement Technology

OS Guard,
Execute Disable Bit,
Boot Guard,
Mode-based Execute Control,
Control-Flow Enforcement Technology
Max display resolution

4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
5120 x 3200@120Hz (eDP)

-
CPU-Z single thread670 691
CPU-Z multi thread4,972 4,977
Cinebench R15 single thread248 252
Cinebench R15 multi-thread1,823 1,777
Cinebench R20 single thread637 661
Cinebench R20 multi-thread4,773 4,723
Cinebench R23 single thread1,683 1,687
Cinebench R23 multi-thread12,352 12,240
PassMark single thread3,038 3,542
PassMark CPU Mark17,124 19,749
(Windows)
Geekbench 4 single core
7,313 7,499
(Windows)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
32,290 36,025
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 single core
2,104 1,692
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
8,609 8,895
(Windows)
Geekbench 6 single core
2,296 2,435
(Windows)
Geekbench 6 multi-core
9,638 10,217
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS Performance
568.9 GFLOPS 547.9 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
497 pts / W 554 pts / W
Amazon
eBay



We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have an ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that their respective TDP are of the same order. Both were produced in the same year.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.


CPU-Z - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score
Intel Core i5-12400F 691
4,977
Intel Core i5-12400 670
4,972


In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 0%.


CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.




Cinebench R15 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score
Intel Core i5-12400 248
1,823
Intel Core i5-12400F 252
1,777


In single core, the difference is -2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 3%.


Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.


Cinebench R20 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score
Intel Core i5-12400 637
4,773
Intel Core i5-12400F 661
4,723


In single core, the difference is -4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1%.


Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.




Cinebench R23 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score
Intel Core i5-12400 1,683
12,352
Intel Core i5-12400F 1,687
12,240


In single core, the difference is -0%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1%.


Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.


PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i5-12400F 3,542
19,749
Intel Core i5-12400 3,038
17,124


In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 15%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Windows:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows
Intel Core i5-12400F 7,499
36,025
Intel Core i5-12400 7,313
32,290


In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 12%.

With Linux:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Linux
Intel Core i5-12400F 7,471
35,034
Intel Core i5-12400 6,681
29,855


In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 17%.

With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Intel Core i5-12400 6,531
26,208
Intel Core i5-12400F 6,444
26,025


In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1%.

With Mac OS X:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Mac OS X
Intel Core i5-12400F 7,134
34,054
Intel Core i5-12400 5,309
31,751


In single core, the difference is 34%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 7%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.




With Windows:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows
Intel Core i5-12400F 1,692
8,895
Intel Core i5-12400 2,104
8,609


In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 3%.

With Linux:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Linux
Intel Core i5-12400 1,816
9,158
Intel Core i5-12400F 1,753
8,528


In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 7%.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Intel Core i5-12400 1,623
8,784
Intel Core i5-12400F 1,444
8,018


In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 10%.

With macOS:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - macOS
Intel Core i5-12400F 1,732
8,156
Intel Core i5-12400 1,136
7,891


In single core, the difference is 52%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 3%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.




With Windows:

Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows
Intel Core i5-12400F 2,435
10,217
Intel Core i5-12400 2,296
9,638


In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 6%.

With Linux:

Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Linux
Intel Core i5-12400 2,499
10,480
Intel Core i5-12400F 2,377
9,425


In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 11%.

With Android:

Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Intel Core i5-12400F 2,191
9,471
Intel Core i5-12400 1,993
7,827


In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 21%.

With macOS:

Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - macOS
Intel Core i5-12400F 2,365
10,277
Intel Core i5-12400 2,159
8,193


In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 25%.


Geekbench 6 is a benchmarking platform that is capable of evaluating the performance of a device across multiple operating systems. The software evaluates processor power, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, browsing; GPU computing capabilities, with image editing, video editing, gaming skills, machine learning workloads.


Equivalence:

Intel Core i5-12400 AMD EquivalentIntel Core i5-12400F AMD Equivalent

See also:

Intel Core i5-12400T




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland