FR
Intel Core i5-1135G7 vs Intel Core i5-1235U
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-1135G7 on one side and the Intel Core i5-1235U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the ultrabook sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.2GHz. The second is used on the notebook segment, it has a total of 10 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4.4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Intel Core i5-1135G7 | Intel Core i5-1235U | ||||||
| Market (main) | Ultrabook | Notebook | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Willow Cove | Golden Cove + Gracemont | ||||||
| Core name | Tiger Lake-UP3 | Alder Lake-U | ||||||
| Family | Core i5-1100 | Core i5-1200 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | FH8069004531301, SRK05 |
FJ8071504826802, FJ8071504826803, SRLFQ, SRLFR |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2020 | Q1 2022 | ||||||
| Lithography | 10 nm SuperFin | Intel 7 | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 10 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 12 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 900 MHz | 1.3 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 4.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz | ||||||
| Energy cores | - |
8 Cores 8 Threads @ 0.9 / 3.3 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | - |
2 Cores 4 Threads @ 1.3 / 4.4 GHz |
||||||
| Cache memory | 8 MB | 12 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 |
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 20 | ||||||
| TDP | 28 W | 15 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 96 | 80 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 768 | 640 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 400 MHz | 300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1300 MHz | 1200 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 1,690 GFLOPS | 1,664 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | BGA1449 | BGA1744 | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 100°C | 100°C | ||||||
| AI accelerator | Gaussian & Neural Accelerator, Deep Learning Boost |
Gaussian & Neural Accelerator, Deep Learning Boost |
||||||
| Crypto engine | AES New Instructions |
AES New Instructions, Secure Key |
||||||
| Security | OS Guard, Boot Guard, Mode-based Execute Control, Control-Flow Enforcement Technology |
OS Guard, Boot Guard, Mode-based Execute Control, Control-Flow Enforcement Technology |
||||||
| Max display resolution | 7680x4320@60Hz |
4096 x 2304@60Hz (HDMI), 7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP), 4096 x 2304@120Hz (eDP) |
||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 505 | 538 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 2,489 | 4,116 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 195 | 217 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 837 | 1,164 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 515 | 618 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 1,999 | 2,946 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 1,325 | 1,625 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 5,866 | 6,623 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2,495 | 3,323 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 8,347 | 11,128 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 5,679 | 5,319 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 19,591 | 26,293 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core | 1,394 | 1,640 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 5,099 | 6,057 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 372.3 GFLOPS | 399.6 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 700 pts / W | 1,753 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Intel Core i5-1235U has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i5-1235U is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i5-1235U is less. The Intel Core i5-1235U was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z - Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
Intel Core i5-1235U |
538 4,116 |
| Intel Core i5-1135G7 |
505 2,489 |
In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 65%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-1235U |
217 1,164 |
| Intel Core i5-1135G7 |
195 837 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 39%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 - Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-1235U |
618 2,946 |
| Intel Core i5-1135G7 |
515 1,999 |
In single core, the difference is 20%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 47%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| Cinebench R23 - Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-1235U |
1,625 6,623 |
| Intel Core i5-1135G7 |
1,325 5,866 |
In single core, the difference is 23%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 13%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-1235U |
3,323 11,128 |
| Intel Core i5-1135G7 |
2,495 8,347 |
In single core, the difference is 33%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 33%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-1235U |
5,319 26,293 |
| Intel Core i5-1135G7 |
5,679 19,591 |
In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 34%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-1235U |
5,323 22,335 |
| Intel Core i5-1135G7 |
5,802 17,791 |
In single core, the difference is 9%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 26%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-1235U |
6,600 31,756 |
| Intel Core i5-1135G7 |
4,969 15,624 |
In single core, the difference is 33%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 103%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-1235U |
1,640 6,057 |
| Intel Core i5-1135G7 |
1,394 5,099 |
In single core, the difference is 18%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 19%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-1235U |
1,724 7,017 |
| Intel Core i5-1135G7 |
1,160 4,359 |
In single core, the difference is 49%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 61%.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-1235U |
1,453 5,854 |
| Intel Core i5-1135G7 |
1,263 3,619 |
In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 62%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i5-1135G7 AMD equivalentIntel Core i5-1235U AMD equivalentDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.