FR
Intel Core i5-10400F vs Intel Core i5-12400F
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-10400F on one side and the Intel Core i5-12400F on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.3GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4.4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Intel Core i5-10400F | Intel Core i5-12400F | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Comet Lake | Golden Cove + Gracemont | ||||||
| Core name | Comet Lake-S | Alder Lake | ||||||
| Family | Core i5-10000 | Core i5-12000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | BX8070110400F, BXC8070110400F, CM8070104282719, CM8070104290716, QUL6, SRH3D, SRH79 | CM8071504555318, CM8071504650609, BX8071512400F, SRL4W, SRL5Z | ||||||
| Release date | Q2 2020 | Q1 2022 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm+++ | Intel 7 | ||||||
| Cores | 6 | 6 | ||||||
| Threads | 12 | 12 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2.9 GHz | 2.5 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 4.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores | - |
6 Cores 12 Threads @ 2.5 / 4.4 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 12 MB | 18 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-2666 |
DDR5-4800 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 20 | ||||||
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply  |
600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | None | ||||||
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1700 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1200 Motherboard |
Socket LGA 1700 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 100°C | 100°C | ||||||
| AI accelerator | - |
Gaussian & Neural Accelerator | ||||||
| Crypto engine | AES New Instructions, Secure Key |
AES New Instructions, Secure Key | ||||||
| Security | Software Guard Extensions, OS Guard, Execute Disable Bit, Boot Guard |
OS Guard, Execute Disable Bit, Boot Guard, Mode-based Execute Control, Control-Flow Enforcement Technology | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 462 | 691 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 3,597 | 4,977 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 180 | 252 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1,296 | 1,777 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 438 | 661 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 3,131 | 4,723 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 1,116 | 1,687 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 7,994 | 12,240 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2,579 | 3,542 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 12,578 | 19,749 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 4 single core | 4,867 | 7,499 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 22,083 | 36,025 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core | 1,133 | 1,692 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 5,873 | 8,895 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS Performance | 402.6 GFLOPS | 547.9 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 340 pts / W | 554 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have an ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i5-12400F is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Intel Core i5-12400F was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
| CPU-Z - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F |
691 4,977 |
| Intel Core i5-10400F |
462 3,597 |
In single core, the difference is 50%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 38%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F |
252 1,777 |
| Intel Core i5-10400F |
180 1,296 |
In single core, the difference is 40%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 37%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F |
661 4,723 |
| Intel Core i5-10400F |
438 3,131 |
In single core, the difference is 51%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 51%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| Cinebench R23 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F |
1,687 12,240 |
| Intel Core i5-10400F |
1,116 7,994 |
In single core, the difference is 51%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 53%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F |
3,542 19,749 |
| Intel Core i5-10400F |
2,579 12,578 |
In single core, the difference is 37%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 57%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
With Windows:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F |
7,499 36,025 |
| Intel Core i5-10400F |
4,867 22,083 |
In single core, the difference is 54%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 63%.
With Linux:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F |
7,471 35,034 |
| Intel Core i5-10400F |
4,787 21,046 |
In single core, the difference is 56%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 66%.
With Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F |
6,444 26,025 |
| Intel Core i5-10400F |
5,142 15,905 |
In single core, the difference is 25%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 64%.
With Mac OS X:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Mac OS X | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F |
7,134 34,054 |
| Intel Core i5-10400F |
5,540 26,324 |
In single core, the difference is 29%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 29%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
With Windows:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F |
1,692 8,895 |
| Intel Core i5-10400F |
1,133 5,873 |
In single core, the difference is 49%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 51%.
With Linux:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F |
1,753 8,528 |
| Intel Core i5-10400F |
1,197 5,446 |
In single core, the difference is 46%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 57%.
With Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F |
1,444 8,018 |
| Intel Core i5-10400F |
1,003 5,769 |
In single core, the difference is 44%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 39%.
With macOS:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - macOS | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F |
1,732 8,156 |
| Intel Core i5-10400F |
1,059 5,382 |
In single core, the difference is 64%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 52%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i5-10400F AMD EquivalentIntel Core i5-12400F AMD EquivalentSee also:
Intel Core i5-10400Intel Core i5-10400HIntel Core i5-10400TIntel Core i5-12400Intel Core i5-12400T
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.