FR
Intel Celeron N4020 vs Intel Celeron N4500
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Celeron N4020 on one side and the Intel Celeron N4500 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the entry-level notebook sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.8GHz. The second is used on the entry-level notebook segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 2 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.8 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Intel Celeron N4020 | Intel Celeron N4500 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Entry-level notebook | Entry-level notebook | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Goldmont Plus | Tremont | ||||||
| Core name | Gemini Lake Refresh | Jasper Lake | ||||||
| Family | Celeron 4000 | Celeron 4000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | FH8068003067426, SRET0 |
DC8069704609907, SRKH0 |
||||||
| Release date | Q4 2019 | Q1 2021 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm | ||||||
| Cores | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Threads | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 1.1 GHz | 1.1 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores | 2 Cores 2 Threads @ 1.1 / 2.8 GHz |
2 Cores 2 Threads @ 1.1 / 2.8 GHz |
||||||
| Cache memory | 4 MB | 4 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4/LPDDR4 2400 MT/s |
DDR4-2933, LPDDR4x |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | 38.4 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 6 | 8 | ||||||
| TDP | 6 W | 6 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16EU) | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 12 | 16 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 96 | 128 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 200 MHz | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 650 MHz | 750 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 144 GFLOPS | 192 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | BGA1090 | BGA1338 | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 105°C | 105°C | ||||||
| Crypto engine | AES New Instructions, Secure Key |
AES New Instructions |
||||||
| Security | Execute Disable Bit, OS Guard |
OS Guard, Boot Guard, Mode-based Execute Control |
||||||
| Max display resolution | 4096 x 2160@30Hz (HDMI) 4096 x 2160@60Hz (DP), 4096 x 2160@60Hz (eDP) |
4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI) 4096 x 2160@60Hz (DP), 4096 x 2160@60Hz (eDP) |
||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 206 | 237 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 418 | 486 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 80 | 79 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 145 | 174 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 170 | 190 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 300 | 335 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 417 | 443 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 705 | 711 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1,188 | 1,402 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 1,578 | 1,955 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 4 single core | 1,991 | 2,853 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 3,426 | 4,681 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core | 468 | 614 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 851 | 1,071 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 24.5 GFLOPS | 31.3 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 571 pts / W | 780 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Intel Celeron N4500 was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
| CPU-Z - Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
Intel Celeron N4500 |
237 486 |
| Intel Celeron N4020 |
206 418 |
In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 16%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4500 |
79 174 |
| Intel Celeron N4020 |
80 145 |
In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 20%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 - Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4500 |
190 335 |
| Intel Celeron N4020 |
170 300 |
In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 12%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| Cinebench R23 - Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4500 |
443 711 |
| Intel Celeron N4020 |
417 705 |
In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4500 |
1,402 1,955 |
| Intel Celeron N4020 |
1,188 1,578 |
In single core, the difference is 18%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 24%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4500 |
2,853 4,681 |
| Intel Celeron N4020 |
1,991 3,426 |
In single core, the difference is 43%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 37%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4500 |
2,788 4,512 |
| Intel Celeron N4020 |
2,304 3,875 |
In single core, the difference is 21%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 16%.
On Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4500 |
2,742 4,620 |
| Intel Celeron N4020 |
2,192 3,768 |
In single core, the difference is 25%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 23%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4500 |
614 1,071 |
| Intel Celeron N4020 |
468 851 |
In single core, the difference is 31%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 26%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4500 |
676 1,262 |
| Intel Celeron N4020 |
490 925 |
In single core, the difference is 38%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 36%.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4500 |
623 1,170 |
| Intel Celeron N4020 |
469 867 |
In single core, the difference is 33%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 35%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Intel Celeron N4020 AMD equivalentIntel Celeron N4500 AMD equivalentSee also:
Intel Celeron N4020CIntel Celeron N4505
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.