FR
Intel Celeron J4105 vs Rockchip RK3399
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Celeron J4105 on one side and the Rockchip RK3399 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the mini desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.5GHz. The second is used on the single-board computer segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 6 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | Intel Celeron J4105 | Rockchip RK3399 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Mini desktop | Single-board computer | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | ARMv8-A (64-bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Goldmont Plus | Cortex-A72, Cortex-A53 | ||||||
| Core name | Gemini Lake | Cortex-A72, Cortex-A53 | ||||||
| Family | Celeron 4000 | RK3300 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | FH8068003067403, SR3S4 |
RK3399(K), RK3399 K |
||||||
| Release date | Q4 2017 | Q1 2016 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm HKMG | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 6 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 6 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 1.5 GHz | 1.5 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.0 GHz | ||||||
| Energy cores | - |
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.5 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | - |
2x ARM Cortex-A72 @ 2.0 GHz |
||||||
| Cache memory | 4 MB | 1.512 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 4 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4/LPDDR4 |
LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4 SDRAM |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 6 | 4 | ||||||
| TDP | 10 W | 7 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | ARM Mali-T860 MP4 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 12 | 4 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 96 | 64 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 250 MHz | 600 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 750 MHz | 600 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 144 GFLOPS | 81.6 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | BGA1090 | SoC | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket BGA 1090 Motherboard  |
- | ||||||
| Drystone MIPS | - | 32,600 DMIPS | ||||||
| Crypto engine | - |
AES 128/192/256, DES/3DES, SHA1/SHA256/MD5, PRNG, TRNG |
||||||
| Security | - |
Trustzone |
||||||
| Max display resolution | - |
4K@60fps |
||||||
| Video decoding | - | H.265/H.264 4K@60fps | ||||||
| Video encoding | - | H.264 1080p@30fps | ||||||
| Modem | - | 10/100/1000M Ethernet | ||||||
| Connectivity | - | HDMI 2.0, USB 2.0, USB 3.0 | ||||||
| Audio | - |
I2S, PCM, SPDIF |
||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 2,916 | 1,378 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit | Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 1,827 | 1,144 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit | Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 5,208 | 2,776 | ||||||
| (Windows | Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 414 | 269 | ||||||
| (Windows | Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 1,355 | 615 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 42.34 GFLOPS | 23.9 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 521 pts / W | 397 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Celeron J4105 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Rockchip RK3399 is less. The Intel Celeron J4105 was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron J4105 |
2,096 6,280 |
| Rockchip RK3399 |
1,144 2,776 |
In single core, the difference is 83%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 126%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron J4105 |
424 1,424 |
| Rockchip RK3399 |
269 615 |
In single core, the difference is 58%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 132%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Intel Celeron J4105 AMD equivalentRockchip RK3399 Intel equivalentRockchip RK3399 AMD equivalentSee also:
Rockchip RK3399-TRockchip RK3399ProRockchip RK3399SDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.