FR
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs Qualcomm SM8325 Snapdragon 888 4G
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E on one side and the Qualcomm SM8325 Snapdragon 888 4G on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.1GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.8 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | HiSilicon Kirin 9000E | Qualcomm SM8325 Snapdragon 888 4G | ||||||
| Market (main) | Smartphone | Smartphone | ||||||
| ISA | ARMv8.2-A (64-bit) | ARMv8-A (64-bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Cortex-A77, Cortex-A55, DynamIQ | Cortex-X1, Cortex-A78, Cortex-A55 | ||||||
| Core name | Cortex-A77, Cortex-A55, DynamIQ | Kryo 680 Prime, Kryo 680 Gold, Kryo 680 Silver |
||||||
| Family | Kirin 9000 | Snapdragon 800 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | Kirin 9000E, Kirin 9000E 5G | SM8325, SDM888 | ||||||
| Release date | Q4 2020 | Q4 2021 | ||||||
| Lithography | 5 nm FinFET EUV | 5 nm (5LPE) | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2.0 GHz | 1.8 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3.1 GHz | 2.8 GHz | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.05 GHz | 4x Qualcomm Kryo 680 Silver @ 1.8 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores | 1x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 3.13 GHz 3x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 2.54 GHz |
1x Qualcomm Kryo 680 Prime @ 2.84 GHz 3x Qualcomm Kryo 680 Gold @ 2.42 GHz |
||||||
| Cache memory | 2 MB | 4 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | LPDDR4X-2133, LPDDR5-2750 | LPDDR5-3200 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 44 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s | ||||||
| TDP | 6 W | 10 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G78 MP22 | Qualcomm Adreno 660 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 22 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 352 | 512 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 759 MHz | 840 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 2,137.3 GFLOPS | 1,720.3 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | SoC | SoC | ||||||
| AI accelerator | - | Qualcomm AI Engine | ||||||
| AI computing operations per seconds | - | 26 TOPS | ||||||
| DSP | - | Qualcomm Hexagon 780 | ||||||
| DSP computing operations per seconds | - | 26 TOPS | ||||||
| ISP | - | Qualcomm Spectra 580 | ||||||
| Max display resolution | - | 3840 x 2160 pixels | ||||||
| Video decoding | - | H.264, H.265, 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps, HD@960fps |
||||||
| Video encoding | - | H.264, H.265, 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps, HD@960fps |
||||||
| Max camera ISP | - | 28 MP + 28 MP + 28 MP, 200 MP | ||||||
| Max video capture | - | 28 MP@30fps | ||||||
| Cellular technologies | - | CDMA, EVDO GSM, HSPA, LTE, WCDMA, TD-SCDMA |
||||||
| GNSS | - | BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS | ||||||
| LTE category | - | Cat 22 / 24 | ||||||
| 5G download speed | - | Up to 7.5 Gbit/s | ||||||
| 5G upload speed | - | Up to 3 Gbit/s | ||||||
| Connectivity | - | FastConnect 6900, Quick Charge 5, USB 3.1, USB-C |
||||||
| Wi-Fi | - | Wi-Fi 6E, 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | ||||||
| Bluetooth | - | Bluetooth 5.2 | ||||||
| Radio | - | FM | ||||||
| Audio | - | Qualcomm Aqstic | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 974 | 695 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 3,544 | 2,275 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is greater, that the PDT of HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is lower. The Qualcomm SM8325 Snapdragon 888 4G was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E |
974 3,544 |
| Qualcomm SM8325 Snapdragon 888 4G |
695 2,275 |
In single core, the difference is 40%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 56%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Intel equivalentHiSilicon Kirin 9000E AMD equivalentQualcomm SM8325 Snapdragon 888 4G Intel equivalentQualcomm SM8325 Snapdragon 888 4G AMD equivalentSee also:
HiSilicon Kirin 9000Smartphones with the processor HiSilicon Kirin 9000E:
Huawei Mate 40Smartphones with the processor Qualcomm SM8325 Snapdragon 888 4G:
Huawei P50 Pro SD888Huawei P50 SD888Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.