FR
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E on one side and the Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.1GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | HiSilicon Kirin 9000E | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Smartphone | Smartphone | ||||||
| ISA | ARMv8.2-A (64-bit) | ARMv8-A (64-bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Cortex-A77, Cortex-A55, DynamIQ | Cortex-A73, Cortex-A53 | ||||||
| Core name | Cortex-A77, Cortex-A55, DynamIQ | Kryo 260 Gold, Kryo 260 Silver | ||||||
| Family | Kirin 9000 | Snapdragon 600 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | Kirin 9000E, Kirin 9000E 5G | SM6115 | ||||||
| Release date | Q4 2020 | Q1 2020 | ||||||
| Lithography | 5 nm FinFET EUV | 11 nm LPP | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2.0 GHz | 1.8 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3.1 GHz | 2.0 GHz | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.05 GHz | 4x qualcomm Kryo 260 Silver @ 1.8 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores | 1x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 3.13 GHz 3x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 2.54 GHz |
4x qualcomm Kryo 260 Gold @ 2.0 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 2 MB | 1 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | LPDDR4X-2133, LPDDR5-2750 | LPDDR3-933, LPDDR4-1866 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 4 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 44 GB/s | 13.91 GB/s | ||||||
| TDP | 6 W | 9 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G78 MP22 | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 22 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 352 | 96 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 759 MHz | - | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 759 MHz | 600 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 2,137.3 GFLOPS | 115.2 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | SoC | SoC | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 738,905 | 178,482 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 4,756 | 1,457 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 13,978 | 5,397 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 974 | 295 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 3,544 | 1,285 | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 2,330 pts / W | 600 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is greater, that the PDT of HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is lower. Both were produced in the same year.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E |
738,905 |
| Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 |
178,482 |
The difference is 314%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| HiSilicon Kirin 9000E |
4,756 13,978 |
| Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 |
1,457 5,397 |
In single core, the difference is 226%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 159%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| HiSilicon Kirin 9000E |
974 3,544 |
| Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 |
295 1,285 |
In single core, the difference is 230%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 176%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Intel equivalentHiSilicon Kirin 9000E AMD equivalentQualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 Intel equivalentQualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 AMD equivalentSee also:
HiSilicon Kirin 9000Smartphones with the processor HiSilicon Kirin 9000E:
Huawei Mate 40Smartphones with the processor Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662:
Honor 50 LiteHuawei Nova 8iLenovo K12 NoteLenovo K12 ProMotorola Moto G Power (2021)Motorola Moto G30Motorola Moto G9Motorola Moto G9 PlayMotorola Moto G9 PowerNokia 5.4Oppo A73Oppo A74Oppo A95Oppo F17Oppo F19Realme 7iTCL 20LTCL 20L+Vivo Y31 (2021)Xiaomi Poco M3Xiaomi Redmi 9 PowerXiaomi Redmi 9TDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.