FR
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs Qualcomm MSM8930AB Snapdragon 400
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E on one side and the Qualcomm MSM8930AB Snapdragon 400 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.1GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 2 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.7 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | HiSilicon Kirin 9000E | Qualcomm MSM8930AB Snapdragon 400 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Smartphone | Smartphone | ||||||
| ISA | ARMv8.2-A (64-bit) | ARMv7-A (32-bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Cortex-A77, Cortex-A55, DynamIQ | Krait 300 | ||||||
| Family | Kirin 9000 | Snapdragon 400 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | Kirin 9000E, Kirin 9000E 5G | MSM8226 | ||||||
| Release date | Q4 2020 | Q4 2013 | ||||||
| Lithography | 5 nm FinFET EUV | 28 nm LP | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 2 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 2 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2.0 GHz | 1.7 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3.1 GHz | - | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.05 GHz | - | ||||||
| High performance cores | 1x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 3.13 GHz 3x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 2.54 GHz |
2x Qualcomm Krait 300 @ 1.7 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 2 MB | 1 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 3 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | LPDDR4X-2133, LPDDR5-2750 | LPDDR2-533 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 4 | 1 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 44 GB/s | 4.26 GB/s | ||||||
| TDP | 6 W | 3 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G78 MP22 | Qualcomm Adreno 305 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 22 | 1 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 352 | 24 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 759 MHz | 400 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 2,137.3 GFLOPS | 21.6 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | SoC | SoC | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 738,905 | 14,841 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 4,756 | 657 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 13,978 | 1,045 | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 2,330 pts / W | 348 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor HiSilicon Kirin 9000E has more cores, the maximum frequency of HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Qualcomm MSM8930AB Snapdragon 400 is less. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E |
738,905 |
| Qualcomm MSM8930AB Snapdragon 400 |
14,841 |
The difference is 4879%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| HiSilicon Kirin 9000E |
4,756 13,978 |
| Qualcomm MSM8930AB Snapdragon 400 |
657 1,045 |
In single core, the difference is 624%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1238%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Intel equivalentHiSilicon Kirin 9000E AMD equivalentQualcomm MSM8930AB Snapdragon 400 Intel equivalentQualcomm MSM8930AB Snapdragon 400 AMD equivalentSee also:
HiSilicon Kirin 9000Smartphones with the processor HiSilicon Kirin 9000E:
Huawei Mate 40Smartphones with the processor Qualcomm MSM8930AB Snapdragon 400:
Samsung I9190 Galaxy S4 MiniDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.