HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs Intel Celeron N2940


HiSilicon Kirin 9000E on Amazon USA
Intel Celeron N2940 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E on one side and the Intel Celeron N2940 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.1GHz. The second is used on the entry-level notebook segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.3 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.






Specifications:


Processor HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Intel Celeron N2940
Market (main) Smartphone Entry-level notebook
ISA ARMv8.2-A (64-bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture Cortex-A77, Cortex-A55, DynamIQ Silvermont
Core name Cortex-A77, Cortex-A55, DynamIQ Bay Trail-M
Family Kirin 9000 Celeron N2000
Part number(s), S-Spec Kirin 9000E, Kirin 9000E 5G FH8065301919600,
SR1YV
Release date Q4 2020 Q3 2014
Lithography 5 nm FinFET EUV 22 nm
Transistors - 960,000,000
Cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Base frequency 2.0 GHz 1.8 GHz
Turbo frequency 3.1 GHz 2.3 GHz
Energy cores 4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.05 GHz -
High performance cores 1x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 3.13 GHz
3x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 2.54 GHz
-
Cache memory 2 MB 2 MB
Max memory capacity 8 GB 8 GB
Memory types LPDDR4X-2133, LPDDR5-2750 DDR3L 1333
Max # of memory channels 4 2
Max memory bandwidth 44 GB/s 21.32 GB/s
TDP 6 W 8 W
GPU integrated graphics ARM Mali-G78 MP22 Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
GPU execution units 22 4
GPU shading units 352 32
GPU base clock 759 MHz 313 MHz
GPU boost clock 759 MHz 854 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 2,137.3 GFLOPS 42.69 GFLOPS
Socket SoC BGA1170
(Android 64-bit | Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
4,756 1,077
(Android 64-bit | Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
13,978 2,632
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
2,330 pts / W 351 pts / W
Amazon
eBay



We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor HiSilicon Kirin 9000E has more cores, the maximum frequency of HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is greater, that the PDT of HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is lower. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E was designed earlier.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 4,756
13,978
Intel Celeron N2940 1,169
2,744


In single core, the difference is 307%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 409%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.


On Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 974
3,544
Intel Celeron N2940 215
705


In single core, the difference is 353%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 403%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.


Equivalence:

HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Intel equivalentHiSilicon Kirin 9000E AMD equivalentIntel Celeron N2940 AMD equivalent

See also:

HiSilicon Kirin 9000

Smartphones with the processor HiSilicon Kirin 9000E:

Huawei Mate 40




GadgetVersus.com © 2022 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland