HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs Dual AMD EPYC 7702
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E on one side and the Dual AMD EPYC 7702 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.1GHz. The second is used on the server segment, it has a total of 64 cores, 128 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | |
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E |
| | |
Dual AMD EPYC 7702 |
| |
Market | |
Smartphone |
| | |
Server |
| |
Family | |
Kirin |
| | |
Zen 2 |
| |
Part number(s), S-Spec | |
Kirin 9000E, Kirin 9000E 5G |
| | |
100-000000038,
100-100000038WOF |
| |
Release date | |
Q4 2020 |
| | |
Q3 2019 |
| |
Lithography | |
5 nm FinFET EUV |
| | |
7 nm |
| |
Transistors | |
- |
| | |
64,000,000,000 |
| |
Cores | |
8 |
| | |
128 |
| |
Threads | |
8 |
| | |
256 |
| |
Base frequency | |
2.0 GHz |
| | |
2.0 GHz |
| |
Turbo frequency | |
3.1 GHz |
| | |
3.4 GHz |
| |
Energy cores | |
4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.05 GHz |
| | |
- |
| |
High performance cores | |
1x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 3.13 GHz
3x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 2.54 GHz |
| | |
- |
| |
Cache memory | |
2 MB |
| | |
512 MB |
| |
Max memory capacity | |
8 GB |
| | |
8 TB |
| |
Memory types | |
LPDDR4X-2133, LPDDR5-2750 |
| | |
DDR4-3200 |
| |
Max # of memory channels | |
4 |
| | |
16 |
| |
Max memory bandwidth | |
44 GB/s |
| | |
381.4 GB/s |
| |
TDP | |
6 W |
| | |
400 W |
| |
GPU integrated graphics | |
ARM Mali-G78 MP22 |
| | |
None |
| |
GPU execution units | |
22 |
| | |
- |
| |
GPU shading units | |
352 |
| | |
- |
| |
Amazon | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
eBay | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. The processor Dual AMD EPYC 7702 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Dual AMD EPYC 7702 is bigger, that the PDT of HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is lower. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
There are still no results in the benchmark platforms for at least one of these processors. Please come back later.Equivalence:
Dual AMD EPYC 7702 Intel equivalentSee also:
HiSilicon Kirin 9000AMD EPYC 7702AMD EPYC 7702PSmartphones with the processor HiSilicon Kirin 9000E:
Huawei Mate 40
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.