HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs Samsung Exynos 880
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 on one side and the Samsung Exynos 880 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.1GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | |
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 |
| | |
Samsung Exynos 880 |
| |
Market | |
Smartphone |
| | |
Smartphone |
| |
Family | |
Kirin |
| | |
Exynos 800 series |
| |
Part number(s), S-Spec | |
Kirin 9000, Kirin 9000 5G |
| | |
Exynos 880 |
| |
Release date | |
Q4 2020 |
| | |
Q2 2020 |
| |
Lithography | |
5 nm FinFET EUV |
| | |
8 nm LPP |
| |
Cores | |
8 |
| | |
8 |
| |
Threads | |
8 |
| | |
8 |
| |
Base frequency | |
2.0 GHz |
| | |
1.8 GHz |
| |
Turbo frequency | |
3.1 GHz |
| | |
2.0 GHz |
| |
Energy cores | |
4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.05 GHz |
| | |
6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.8 GHz |
| |
High performance cores | |
1x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 3.13 GHz
3x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 2.54 GHz |
| | |
2x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 2.0 GHz |
| |
Cache memory | |
2 MB |
| | |
2 MB |
| |
Max memory capacity | |
8 GB |
| | |
8 GB |
| |
Memory types | |
LPDDR4X-2133, LPDDR5-2750 |
| | |
LPDDR4X |
| |
Max # of memory channels | |
4 |
| | |
4 |
| |
TDP | |
6 W |
| | |
7 W |
| |
GPU integrated graphics | |
ARM Mali-G78 MP24 |
| | |
ARM Mali-G76 MP5 |
| |
GPU execution units | |
24 |
| | |
5 |
| |
GPU shading units | |
384 |
| | |
80 |
| |
GPU max clock rate | |
- |
| | |
720 MHz |
| |
GPU FP32 floating point | |
- |
| | |
115.2 GFLOPS |
| |
AnTuTu | |
689,081 |
| | |
288,090 |
| |
(Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | |
4,693 |
| | |
2,951 |
| |
(Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | |
13,767 |
| | |
7,208 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 5 single core | |
963 |
| | |
641 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | |
3,452 |
| | |
1,814 |
| |
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | |
126.98 GFLOPS |
| | |
64.1 GFLOPS |
| |
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | |
2,295 pts / W |
| | |
1,030 pts / W |
| |
Amazon | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
eBay | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is greater, that the PDT of HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is lower. Both were produced in the same year.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
The difference is 139%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
On Android 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 59%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 91%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
In single core, the difference is 50%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 90%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Intel equivalentHiSilicon Kirin 9000 AMD equivalentSamsung Exynos 880 Intel equivalentSamsung Exynos 880 AMD equivalentSee also:
HiSilicon Kirin 9000ESmartphones with the processor HiSilicon Kirin 9000:
Huawei Mate 40 ProHuawei Mate 40 Pro+Huawei Mate 40 RS Porsche DesignSmartphones with the processor Samsung Exynos 880:
Vivo Y70s