FR
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 on one side and the Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.1GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.1 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | HiSilicon Kirin 9000 | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Smartphone | Smartphone | ||||||
| ISA | ARMv8.2-A (64-bit) | ARMv8-A (64-bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Cortex-A77, Cortex-A55, DynamIQ | Cortex-A57, Cortex-A53 | ||||||
| Family | Kirin 9000 | Exynos 7 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | Kirin 9000, Kirin 9000 5G | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 | ||||||
| Release date | Q4 2020 | Q2 2015 | ||||||
| Lithography | 5 nm FinFET EUV | 14 nm LPE | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2.0 GHz | 1.5 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3.1 GHz | 2.1 GHz | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.05 GHz | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.5 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores | 1x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 3.13 GHz 3x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 2.54 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A57 @ 2.1 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 2 MB | 1 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 2 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | LPDDR4X-2133, LPDDR5-2750 | LPDDR4-1533 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 4 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 44 GB/s | 24.88 GB/s | ||||||
| TDP | 6 W | 7 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G78 MP24 | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 24 | 8 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 384 | 128 | ||||||
| GPU clock | - | 772 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 2,331.6 GFLOPS | 210 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | SoC | SoC | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 689,081 | 112,200 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 4,693 | 1,356 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 13,767 | 4,169 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 126.98 GFLOPS | 34.3 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 2,295 pts / W | 596 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is greater, that the PDT of HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is lower. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 |
689,081 |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 |
112,200 |
The difference is 514%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| HiSilicon Kirin 9000 |
4,693 13,767 |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 |
1,356 4,169 |
In single core, the difference is 246%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 230%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Intel equivalentHiSilicon Kirin 9000 AMD equivalentSamsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 Intel equivalentSamsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 AMD equivalentSee also:
HiSilicon Kirin 9000ESmartphones with the processor HiSilicon Kirin 9000:
Huawei Mate 40 ProHuawei Mate 40 Pro+Huawei Mate 40 RS Porsche DesignHuawei Mate X2Smartphones with the processor Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420:
Samsung Galaxy Note5Samsung Galaxy S6Samsung Galaxy S6 EdgeSamsung Galaxy S6 Edge+Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.